Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 3 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 75 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 3 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 3 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 78 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 3 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 40 |
| Tire Rack owners | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 3 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 3 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 62 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportContact 3 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 3 | Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 75 |
| Dry | 87 | 78 |
| Wet | 79 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 75 | 56 |
| Noise | 71 | 87 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 72 |
| Handling | 85 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 | B · Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 58 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ | 16″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A - B A | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Nexen
Too close to call: Continental ContiSportContact 3 and Nexen N Fera SU1 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSportContact 3 is stronger on comfort, handling and dry. Nexen N Fera SU1 is stronger on noise and treadwear.
Continental ContiSportContact 3 scores 75 vs 56 on comfort.
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 87 vs 71 on noise.
Continental ContiSportContact 3 scores 85 vs 75 on handling.
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 72 vs 62 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.