Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ContiTrac vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N Fera SU1

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Nexen N Fera SU1 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Dry
78
Wet
81
Snow
76
Comfort
56
Noise
87
Treadwear
72
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictOnly Nexen N Fera SU1 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
78
Why this score
SourceContiTracN Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) – 75
Tyre Reviews owners – 82
SimpleTire owners – 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
81
Why this score
SourceContiTracN Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) – 85
Tyre Reviews owners – 75
SimpleTire owners – 89

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
76
Why this score
SourceContiTracN Fera SU1
SimpleTire owners – 78

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
56
Why this score
SourceContiTracN Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) – 40
Tyre Reviews owners – 79
SimpleTire owners – 91

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
87
Why this score
SourceContiTracN Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) – 85
SimpleTire owners – 91

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
72
Why this score
SourceContiTracN Fera SU1
Tyre Reviews owners – 71
SimpleTire owners – 87

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
75
Why this score
SourceContiTracN Fera SU1
Tyre Reviews owners – 75

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiTrac vs Nexen N Fera SU1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiTracNexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score – 75
Dry – 78
Wet – 81
Snow – 76
Comfort – 56
Noise – 87
Treadwear – 72
Handling – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiTrac

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Nexen N Fera SU1

The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Very low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
  • Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use

Cons

  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
  • Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
  • Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
  • Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiTrac B · Nexen N Fera SU1
Category—Summer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—58
Rim diameters—16″ – 24″
Tread depth12 - 14/32″9/32″
UTQG520 A B300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 80 psi51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Nexen

Only Nexen N Fera SU1 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental ContiTrac
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.