61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental ContiVanContact 200 vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
68
/ 100
Objective (60%)
68/100
11 professional tests
User signal (40%)
67/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Laufenn S fit EQ — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Continental ContiVanContact 200 if handling and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
S fit EQ leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ContiVanContact 200 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 78 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
S fit EQ leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ContiVanContact 200 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiVanContact 200 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ContiVanContact 200 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 42 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 73 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiVanContact 200 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 57 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
S fit EQ leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | ContiVanContact 200 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 38 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiVanContact 200 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | ContiVanContact 200 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 57 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiVanContact 200 | Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 68 |
| Dry | 76 | 81 |
| Wet | 64 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | 68 | 55 |
| Noise | – | 57 |
| Treadwear | 38 | 74 |
| Handling | 76 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Tire A
68
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/16 · 2019 ADAC Van 215/65 R16 C Tyre Test | 11% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +8.9 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiVanContact 200 receives mixed reviews, with users frequently praising its initial performance in both wet and dry conditions. However, a significant portion of owners report premature and uneven tread wear, particularly on the outer edges, which leads to a substantial decline in grip and safety as the tire ages.
Pros
- Strong initial grip and handling performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Comfortable ride quality
- Acceptable fuel efficiency
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant loss of wet-weather traction as the tread depth decreases
- Pronounced uneven wear patterns, specifically scalloping and outer-edge degradation
- High price point relative to the tire's longevity
Observations
- Users of VW Transporter (T6) vans frequently report severe outer-edge wear and loss of wet grip after approximately 13,000 to 20,000 miles.
- Mercedes Vito owners noted poor performance on loose surfaces like grass and mud, describing the tire as unsuitable for non-paved environments.
The Laufenn S Fit EQ is a polarizing budget-tier tire that offers significant value for casual drivers but struggles to meet the performance demands of spirited or aggressive motorists. While many users praise its quiet ride and cost-effectiveness, others report inconsistent wet-weather traction, flimsy sidewalls, and premature road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting
- Competent dry-weather grip for standard driving conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency reported by some users
Cons
- Weak sidewall construction prone to bubbles and punctures
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and traction
- Lack of steering feedback and poor handling during aggressive cornering
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
Observations
- Performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Renault Sport Clio, suffer from significant sidewall flex and 'wobble' during spirited driving.
- Heavier vehicles or those driven at high speeds (above 170 km/h) may experience overheating and loss of grip due to the soft rubber compound.
- Users noted that the tire is better suited for light, casual city driving rather than high-performance or heavy-load applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiVanContact 200 | B · Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Van | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Continental
68
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Laufenn S fit EQ — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Continental ContiVanContact 200 if handling and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S fit EQ scores 74 vs 38 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiVanContact 200 scores 76 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiVanContact 200 scores 68 vs 55 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S fit EQ scores 81 vs 76 on dry.
Tire A · Continental ContiVanContact 200
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiVanContact 200 also compared with
Laufenn S fit EQ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.