Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs General Grabber A/T — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B General

General Grabber A/T

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

General Grabber A/T tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
265 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
90
Snow
82
Comfort
88
Noise
86
Treadwear
88
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Continental CrossContact LX25 and General Grabber A/T are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on snow, noise and comfort. General Grabber A/T is stronger on dry and handling.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber A/T leads by 13
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
B — General Grabber A/T
95
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Grabber A/T
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tire Rack owners 93 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 81
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 2
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
B — General Grabber A/T
90
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Grabber A/T
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 72
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 12
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — General Grabber A/T
82
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Grabber A/T
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 68
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 6
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — General Grabber A/T
88
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Grabber A/T
Tire Rack owners 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners 97 74
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 7
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
B — General Grabber A/T
86
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Grabber A/T
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 1
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
B — General Grabber A/T
88
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Grabber A/T
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 77
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber A/T leads by 5
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
B — General Grabber A/T
90
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Grabber A/T
Tyre Reviews owners 85 76

Scores at a glance

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs General Grabber A/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25General Grabber A/T
Relative Score 90 89
Dry 82 95
Wet 92 90
Snow 94 82
Comfort 94 88
Noise 93 86
Treadwear 89 88
Handling 85 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B General Grabber A/T

The General Grabber A/T (specifically the ATX variant) is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile all-terrain tire that excels in snow, ice, and varied off-road conditions. While most users praise its comfort and quiet road manners, some report concerns regarding tread life, fuel economy, and a tendency for the tread pattern to retain and eject small rocks.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in snow, ice, and winter conditions
  • Superior ride comfort and relatively low road noise for an aggressive tread
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors like BFG
  • Reliable performance on dirt, gravel, and mud surfaces

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy for many users
  • Tread pattern prone to picking up and throwing small rocks
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Occasional reports of wet-weather traction issues or 'squirm' when new

Observations

  • Users with heavy-duty trucks (e.g., 2500HD models) report good stability for towing, though proper inflation pressure is critical to avoid a 'floating' sensation.
  • Drivers of smaller SUVs and crossovers occasionally report faster tread wear compared to truck applications.
  • Low-profile versions on large-diameter rims (20-inch+) are noted by some as having weaker sidewall durability against potholes and curb impacts.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · General Grabber A/T
Category—All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

General

Too close to call: Continental CrossContact LX25 and General Grabber A/T are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on snow, noise and comfort. General Grabber A/T is stronger on dry and handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber A/T scores 95 vs 82 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 82 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 93 vs 86 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 88 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · General Grabber A/T

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.