Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental Sport Contact 5 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental Sport Contact 5

Summer Max Performance tires

Continental Sport Contact 5 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
72/100
225 owner reviews
Dry
94
Wet
89
Snow
–
Comfort
45
Noise
–
Treadwear
51
Handling
76

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N Fera SU4

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Nexen N Fera SU4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
87
Snow
76
Comfort
88
Noise
91
Treadwear
82
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. Pick the Continental Sport Contact 5 if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 5 leads by 3
A — Continental Sport Contact 5
94
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
91
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5N Fera SU4
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 91

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 5 leads by 2
A — Continental Sport Contact 5
89
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
87
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5N Fera SU4
Professional tests (TWG score) 94 –
Tyre Reviews owners 82 87

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental Sport Contact 5
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
76

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 43
A — Continental Sport Contact 5
45
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
88
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5N Fera SU4
Professional tests (TWG score) 26 –
Tyre Reviews owners 73 87

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental Sport Contact 5
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
91

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 31
A — Continental Sport Contact 5
51
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
82
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5N Fera SU4
Tyre Reviews owners 51 81

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 4
A — Continental Sport Contact 5
76
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
80
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5N Fera SU4
Tyre Reviews owners 76 80
DriverReviews owners 84 –

Scores at a glance

Continental Sport Contact 5 vs Nexen N Fera SU4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Sport Contact 5Nexen N Fera SU4
Relative Score 71 85
Dry 94 91
Wet 89 87
Snow – 76
Comfort 45 88
Noise – 91
Treadwear 51 82
Handling 76 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental Sport Contact 5

The Continental Sport Contact 5 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry grip, offering exceptional confidence and handling for spirited drivers. However, the consensus is heavily polarized by its rapid tread wear, with a significant number of users reporting premature replacement intervals that diminish the tire's overall value proposition.

Pros

  • Exceptional grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • High levels of steering precision and driver feedback
  • Strong braking performance
  • Good comfort and relatively low road noise for a performance tire

Cons

  • Rapid and often premature tread wear
  • High price point relative to longevity
  • Performance degradation as tread depth decreases
  • Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or curbs

Observations

  • Users with high-torque or heavy vehicles (e.g., Audi Q5, Mercedes C-Class, BMW 3-series) frequently report the fastest tread wear, often requiring replacement under 10,000 miles.
  • Drivers of lighter, smaller vehicles (e.g., Fiesta, lightweight sports cars) report significantly better longevity, suggesting the compound is highly sensitive to vehicle weight and load.
  • The 'ContiSeal' (self-sealing) variants are noted for better durability in some instances, though they remain expensive.
Tire B Nexen N Fera SU4

The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
  • Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
  • Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
  • Not suitable for high-performance track applications

Observations

  • Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
  • Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
  • Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Sport Contact 5 B · Nexen N Fera SU4
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Nexen

Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. Pick the Continental Sport Contact 5 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 45 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 80 vs 76 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental Sport Contact 5 scores 94 vs 91 on dry.

Tire A · Continental Sport Contact 5
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.