Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental AllSeasonContact

All Season Premium Touring tires

Continental AllSeasonContact tread pattern
Objective (60%)
93/100
28 professional tests
User signal (40%)
81/100
42 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
86
Snow
79
Comfort
85
Noise
80
Treadwear
76
Handling
82

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
VerdictWinner: Continental AllSeasonContact — better comfort, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 8
A — Continental AllSeasonContact
79
B — Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
87
Why this score
SourceAllSeasonContactSportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Professional tests (TWG score) 76 –
Tyre Reviews owners 82 87

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AllSeasonContact leads by 3
A — Continental AllSeasonContact
86
B — Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
83
Why this score
SourceAllSeasonContactSportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 83

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental AllSeasonContact
79
B — Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
–
Why this score
SourceAllSeasonContactSportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Professional tests (TWG score) 76 –
Tyre Reviews owners 85 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AllSeasonContact leads by 18
A — Continental AllSeasonContact
85
B — Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
67
Why this score
SourceAllSeasonContactSportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Professional tests (TWG score) 86 –
Tyre Reviews owners 83 67

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental AllSeasonContact
80
B — Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
–
Why this score
SourceAllSeasonContactSportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Professional tests (TWG score) 80 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AllSeasonContact leads by 6
A — Continental AllSeasonContact
76
B — Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
70
Why this score
SourceAllSeasonContactSportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Tyre Reviews owners 76 70

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 2
A — Continental AllSeasonContact
82
B — Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
84
Why this score
SourceAllSeasonContactSportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Tyre Reviews owners 82 84

Scores at a glance

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental AllSeasonContactContinental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Relative Score 81 78
Dry 79 87
Wet 86 83
Snow 79 –
Comfort 85 67
Noise 80 –
Treadwear 76 70
Handling 82 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental AllSeasonContact

The Continental AllSeasonContact is widely regarded as a highly capable, balanced all-season tire that excels in wet and wintry conditions while maintaining respectable dry-road performance. Users frequently praise its superior steering feedback and confidence-inspiring grip in adverse weather, often positioning it as a strong competitor to the Michelin CrossClimate series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding tread longevity in hot climates and occasional noise issues.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and snow traction
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics
  • High level of ride comfort and cabin refinement
  • Precise steering feedback compared to segment rivals

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear in high-temperature summer conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise or specific frequency whining
  • Mixed feedback on dry-road performance during extreme heat
  • Some reports of premature tread cracking or durability issues

Observations

  • Users with SUVs and heavier vehicles noted significant improvements in cabin noise and ride comfort compared to OE tires.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented or AWD vehicles (e.g., Audi Quattro, Subaru Outback) report high confidence in snow and slush, though some note that aggressive acceleration can still break traction.
  • Owners in hot climates (e.g., Greece, Southern Europe) report that the tire compound feels too soft during summer, leading to reduced handling precision and faster wear.
Tire B Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat

The Continental SportContact 2 SSR is a polarizing run-flat tire that generally offers superior grip and comfort compared to older generation run-flat competitors like the Bridgestone Potenza. While many users appreciate its wet and dry performance, the tire's aging design is frequently criticized for uneven wear patterns, road noise, and a harsh ride quality on lower-profile fitments.

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry traction performance
  • Improved ride comfort compared to competing run-flat brands
  • Respectable tread longevity for some users
  • Reliable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Tendency for uneven tread wear
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages
  • Harsh ride quality on low-profile, staggered setups
  • Dated design compared to modern tire iterations

Observations

  • Users with higher-profile 16-inch tires report significantly better ride comfort than those using low-profile, staggered setups on BMW 3-series models.
  • Drivers of E90/E92 BMW chassis report mixed experiences, with some noting premature or uneven wear on both front and rear axles.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental AllSeasonContact B · Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Continental

Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact — better comfort, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 85 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat scores 87 vs 79 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 76 vs 70 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 86 vs 83 on wet.

Tire A · Continental AllSeasonContact
Tire B · Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.