81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Firestone Destination HP vs General Grabber M/T — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
39 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Grabber M/T — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Grabber M/T leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Grabber M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Grabber M/T leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Grabber M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Grabber M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Grabber M/T leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Grabber M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 100 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Grabber M/T leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Grabber M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination HP | General Grabber M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 90 |
| Dry | 90 | 94 |
| Wet | 90 | 91 |
| Snow | – | 88 |
| Comfort | 90 | 88 |
| Noise | – | 84 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 88 |
| Handling | 85 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Destination HP receives mixed feedback, characterized by high praise for its versatile off-road and towing capabilities versus concerns regarding tread longevity. While some users report exceptional durability over high mileage, others note premature wear, particularly on the outer edges during regular cornering.
Pros
- Exceptional traction in diverse off-road conditions including sand, mud, and grass
- Strong performance while towing heavy loads
- Reliable handling across varied terrain and bitumen surfaces
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear on the outer edges
- Potential for soft compound degradation under specific driving patterns
- Inconsistent longevity compared to premium alternatives
Observations
- Users operating on Land Rover Freelander 2 platforms reported significant outer-edge wear, suggesting sensitivity to cornering forces.
- The tire demonstrates high durability for heavy-duty towing applications, with some users achieving over 70,000 km of service.
The General Grabber A/T X is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile all-terrain tire that excels in winter conditions and daily driving comfort. While most users praise its aggressive aesthetic and impressive traction on snow and ice, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity, with some users reporting premature wear while others achieve satisfactory mileage.
Pros
- Exceptional traction in snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Aggressive, rugged aesthetic with effective rim protection
- Surprisingly low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth ride quality and balanced handling
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Tendency to pick up and retain small pebbles in the tread
- Occasional reports of difficult warranty claim processes
- Mild road noise noted by some users at specific speed ranges
Observations
- Users with heavy-duty trucks (e.g., GMC Sierra 2500HD, Ford Super Duty) report good load-carrying stability and minimal impact on ride harshness.
- Owners of lifted vehicles (e.g., Silverado Z71 with 2.25-inch lift) noted minor rubbing at full steering lock with larger tire sizes.
- The tire is frequently cited as a superior, more affordable alternative to premium brands like BFGoodrich for both daily commuting and off-road use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination HP | B · General Grabber M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Firestone
90
/ 100
General
Winner: General Grabber M/T — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber M/T scores 88 vs 60 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber M/T scores 90 vs 85 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber M/T scores 94 vs 90 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone Destination HP
Tire B · General Grabber M/T
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone Destination HP also compared with
General Grabber M/T also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.