Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Kumho Ecsta V730 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 94 |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | 98 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 53 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 48 |
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | 55 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 63 | 65 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 66 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | 84 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | 85 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 64 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | 84 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk Indy 500 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 88 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 | Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 74 |
| Dry | 93 | 92 |
| Wet | 84 | 53 |
| Snow | 63 | 65 |
| Comfort | 85 | 73 |
| Noise | 87 | 85 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 75 |
| Handling | 83 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is widely regarded as a premier 'bang-for-the-buck' ultra-high-performance summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional dry grip, sharp steering response, and aggressive aesthetic, often noting that it performs at a level comparable to significantly more expensive premium tires. While some users report concerns regarding tread life and wet-weather hydroplaning resistance, the general consensus is that it offers an unbeatable value proposition for spirited daily driving.
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Aggressive, sporty tread design
- Responsive steering and predictable handling characteristics
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride for a performance tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially with aggressive driving
- Reduced hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain or deep standing water
- Poor performance and potential for flat-spotting in cold temperatures
- Some reports of sidewall softness or 'mushy' feel under extreme load
Observations
- Users with high-horsepower RWD vehicles (e.g., Mustangs, Camaros, Chargers) frequently report improved launch traction compared to OEM tires.
- Drivers of smaller, lightweight sports cars (e.g., Miata, BRZ, Mini) often highlight the tire's ability to transform handling and steering precision.
- Some users noted that the tire runs slightly narrow for its stated size, leading to less rim protection and a 'stretched' look on wider wheels.
The Kumho Ecsta V730 is widely regarded as a high-value, 'budget-friendly' 200TW tire that excels in dry track and autocross environments. While it may not reach the absolute peak lap times of top-tier 'Super 200' competitors, it offers exceptional consistency, heat tolerance, and longevity, making it a favorite for HPDE enthusiasts and budget-conscious racers.
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and predictable handling characteristics at the limit.
- High heat tolerance with minimal 'greasy' drop-off during long track sessions.
- Superior tread life and durability compared to many direct 200TW competitors.
- Highly competitive price point offering significant value for money.
- Stiff sidewalls provide sharp, responsive turn-in and steering precision.
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance, particularly with standing water or worn tread.
- Requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperature, making them poor for cold-weather street use.
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise due to the stiff sidewall construction.
- Inconsistent performance when cold, leading to potential traction loss on street starts.
Observations
- Users with camber-limited vehicles (e.g., stock-class FWD cars) report that the stiff sidewalls and shoulder design handle limited negative camber well, resulting in even wear.
- Heavy vehicles (3500lbs+) note that while the tire handles the weight well, it requires careful pressure management to avoid overheating or premature shoulder wear.
- Drivers of lightweight platforms (e.g., Miata) report exceptional longevity, often getting an entire season of track and autocross use from a single set.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Community opinion on the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is largely positive, praising it as an affordable, high-performing summer tire with great dry grip, impressive wet performance for its price class, and good ride comfort. While some enthusiasts note a slightly softer sidewall response compared to more expensive tier-one options like Michelins, the overwhelming consensus highlights its exceptional value.
“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”
“Firehawk Indy 500s As promised, some initial thoughts. These are extremely comfortable. They honestly made it hard to understand how fast I was going because I've come to gauge my speed based on how much I'm being jostled around. I felt almost nothing with these, and there's so much construction on my way to work from the tire place, including a road that hasn't been surfaced properly yet. Perfect testing run for comfort. In terms of performance these bite the road a lot better and it's a lot easier for me to get moving again. Granted, my run flats were almost bald and that's my most recent memory of how they performed, but it's shocking how much I can take a turn or even just accelerate without any risk of sliding or slipping. It feels like a completely different car honestly, and people aren't kidding when they say "just get better tires" on some of these posts asking about mods. It's not as sexy as a new intake, but it makes a much bigger difference. I mean I feel like I was missing out on at least half of my roadster's potential here. So yeah I definitely like them. I don't mean to insult the tire guys' ability to apply tire shine, but I need to redo that disaster when I'm home. I only have detailing spray right now.”
“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”
“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 reviews Hi all! First post here on Reddit for S2K. I have a 2002 with 80k (130 km's) that is 100% stock. I recently purchased some new tires moving from a Potenza RE-71 (rear) Potenza RE760 (front) I bought the Indy 500 Firehawk since a lot of S2K owners say they are an excellent tire, perfect for the S2K with a ton of great qualities. So far I am thinking a little bit of a mixxed bag. The tires are not as responsive as I thought and don't inspire the same level of cornering confidence. The seem a little mushy/soft and my rear end thus far doesn't seem as firmly planted as I would like. Almost kind of wobbly? Alignment is fine, tires are brand new with less than 100 miles on them and tire pressure is factory spec within 1 psi. The DOT code for the tires is late 2024 so brand new. I don't track the car and these days just baby it around town mostly so the tires use should fine for my use. Thanks! Leer más”
Based on 27 community posts
Kumho Ecsta V730
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 | B · Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 47 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 8.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 A A | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone
Kumho
Winner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V730 if handling matters most to you.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 84 vs 53 on wet.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 85 vs 73 on comfort.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 81 vs 75 on treadwear.
Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 88 vs 83 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.