Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Firestone TZ300A vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | TZ300A | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 91 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | TZ300A | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 87 |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | TZ300A | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 87 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | TZ300A | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 81 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | TZ300A | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone TZ300A | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 85 |
| Dry | 80 | 91 |
| Wet | 79 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 74 | 88 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 82 |
| Handling | 78 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone TZ300A is generally regarded as a reliable, value-oriented summer tire that offers a strong balance of longevity and dry-weather performance. While many users praise its durability and comfort, opinions are polarized regarding road noise and wet-weather handling, with some drivers experiencing significant noise issues or inconsistent grip in challenging conditions.
Pros
- Excellent tread life and overall longevity
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- High value-for-money proposition
- Comfortable ride quality on various road surfaces
Cons
- Inconsistent road noise levels, with some users reporting intrusive drone
- Variable wet-weather performance and occasional aquaplaning concerns
- Lack of steering feedback or 'wallowy' feel on certain vehicle setups
- Poor performance in freezing temperatures or heavy snow
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles (e.g., Citroen C4 Grand Picasso) noted occasional skittishness during acceleration on damp surfaces.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiat Panda) reported excellent torque management and comfort.
- Some users noted that the tire's handling characteristics can feel 'wallowy' at higher speeds on secondary country roads.
The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
- Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
- Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
- Not suitable for high-performance track applications
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
- Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
- Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone TZ300A | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 74 on comfort.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 80 on dry.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 79 on wet.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 78 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.