Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Firestone TZ300A vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Firestone

Firestone TZ300A

Summer High Performance tires

Firestone TZ300A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
24 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
79
Snow
–
Comfort
74
Noise
–
Treadwear
78
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N Fera SU4

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Nexen N Fera SU4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
87
Snow
76
Comfort
88
Noise
91
Treadwear
82
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 11
A — Firestone TZ300A
80
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
91
Why this score
SourceTZ300AN Fera SU4
Tyre Reviews owners 80 91

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 8
A — Firestone TZ300A
79
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
87
Why this score
SourceTZ300AN Fera SU4
Tyre Reviews owners 79 87

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone TZ300A
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
76

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 14
A — Firestone TZ300A
74
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
88
Why this score
SourceTZ300AN Fera SU4
Tyre Reviews owners 74 87

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone TZ300A
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
91

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 4
A — Firestone TZ300A
78
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
82
Why this score
SourceTZ300AN Fera SU4
Tyre Reviews owners 78 81

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 2
A — Firestone TZ300A
78
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
80
Why this score
SourceTZ300AN Fera SU4
Tyre Reviews owners 78 80

Scores at a glance

Firestone TZ300A vs Nexen N Fera SU4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone TZ300ANexen N Fera SU4
Relative Score 78 85
Dry 80 91
Wet 79 87
Snow – 76
Comfort 74 88
Noise – 91
Treadwear 78 82
Handling 78 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firestone TZ300A

The Firestone TZ300A is generally regarded as a reliable, value-oriented summer tire that offers a strong balance of longevity and dry-weather performance. While many users praise its durability and comfort, opinions are polarized regarding road noise and wet-weather handling, with some drivers experiencing significant noise issues or inconsistent grip in challenging conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent tread life and overall longevity
  • Strong dry-weather grip and handling
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Comfortable ride quality on various road surfaces

Cons

  • Inconsistent road noise levels, with some users reporting intrusive drone
  • Variable wet-weather performance and occasional aquaplaning concerns
  • Lack of steering feedback or 'wallowy' feel on certain vehicle setups
  • Poor performance in freezing temperatures or heavy snow

Observations

  • Users with heavier vehicles (e.g., Citroen C4 Grand Picasso) noted occasional skittishness during acceleration on damp surfaces.
  • Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiat Panda) reported excellent torque management and comfort.
  • Some users noted that the tire's handling characteristics can feel 'wallowy' at higher speeds on secondary country roads.
Tire B Nexen N Fera SU4

The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
  • Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
  • Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
  • Not suitable for high-performance track applications

Observations

  • Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
  • Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
  • Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone TZ300A B · Nexen N Fera SU4
CategorySummer High Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone

Nexen

Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 74 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 80 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 79 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 78 on treadwear.

Tire A · Firestone TZ300A
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.