81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone TZ300A — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
24 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Destination HP — better comfort, wet and dry. Pick the Firestone TZ300A if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | TZ300A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | TZ300A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 79 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | TZ300A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 74 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
TZ300A leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | TZ300A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | TZ300A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination HP | Firestone TZ300A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 78 |
| Dry | 90 | 80 |
| Wet | 90 | 79 |
| Comfort | 90 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 78 |
| Handling | 85 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Destination HP receives mixed feedback, characterized by high praise for its versatile off-road and towing capabilities versus concerns regarding tread longevity. While some users report exceptional durability over high mileage, others note premature wear, particularly on the outer edges during regular cornering.
Pros
- Exceptional traction in diverse off-road conditions including sand, mud, and grass
- Strong performance while towing heavy loads
- Reliable handling across varied terrain and bitumen surfaces
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear on the outer edges
- Potential for soft compound degradation under specific driving patterns
- Inconsistent longevity compared to premium alternatives
Observations
- Users operating on Land Rover Freelander 2 platforms reported significant outer-edge wear, suggesting sensitivity to cornering forces.
- The tire demonstrates high durability for heavy-duty towing applications, with some users achieving over 70,000 km of service.
The Firestone TZ300A is generally regarded as a reliable, value-oriented summer tire that offers a strong balance of longevity and dry-weather performance. While many users praise its durability and comfort, opinions are polarized regarding road noise and wet-weather handling, with some drivers experiencing significant noise issues or inconsistent grip in challenging conditions.
Pros
- Excellent tread life and overall longevity
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- High value-for-money proposition
- Comfortable ride quality on various road surfaces
Cons
- Inconsistent road noise levels, with some users reporting intrusive drone
- Variable wet-weather performance and occasional aquaplaning concerns
- Lack of steering feedback or 'wallowy' feel on certain vehicle setups
- Poor performance in freezing temperatures or heavy snow
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles (e.g., Citroen C4 Grand Picasso) noted occasional skittishness during acceleration on damp surfaces.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiat Panda) reported excellent torque management and comfort.
- Some users noted that the tire's handling characteristics can feel 'wallowy' at higher speeds on secondary country roads.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination HP | B · Firestone TZ300A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Firestone
78
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Destination HP — better comfort, wet and dry. Pick the Firestone TZ300A if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone TZ300A scores 78 vs 60 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 74 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 79 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone Destination HP
Tire B · Firestone TZ300A
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone Destination HP also compared with
Firestone TZ300A also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.