Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs General Grabber Arctic — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 58 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | 92 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 55 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | 94 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 65 | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 95 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | 98 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 85% | 89% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | 100 |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | 91 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 77 | 87 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 82 | 93 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | General Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 88 |
| Dry | 68 | 89 |
| Wet | 67 | 91 |
| Snow | 76 | 88 |
| Comfort | 84 | 95 |
| Noise | 77 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 85 |
| Handling | 65 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice Braking | Ice | 100% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter Tyres on Snow | 0 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/19 · The Best Winter Tyres for 2020 | 100% #1/5 · HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter Tyres on Snow | -50 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 98% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter Tyres on Snow | -2.1 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 85% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 89% #1/5 · HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter Tyres on Snow | -3.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 94% #10/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter Tyres on Snow | -6.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Noise | Subj | 91% #8/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 90% #2/5 · HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter Tyres on Snow | +0.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Snow Handling | Subj | 100% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter Tyres on Snow | 0 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and confidence-inspiring performance on ice, deep snow, and slush. While users occasionally note increased road noise or less precise handling on dry pavement compared to all-season alternatives, the consensus remains that it is a premier choice for severe winter climates.
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
- High level of driver confidence in extreme weather
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
- Perceived as less refined in dry conditions compared to the previous WS80 generation
Observations
- Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles without modern traction control reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain mobility.
- Drivers of front-wheel-drive sedans noted significant improvements in winter handling and the ability to avoid using four-wheel-drive modes in moderate conditions.
The General Grabber Arctic is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that offers exceptional traction on snow and ice at a competitive price point. While some users note increased road noise and a slight impact on fuel economy, the consensus highlights its reliability and superior stopping power compared to all-season alternatives.
Pros
- Excellent traction on packed snow, ice, and unplowed surfaces
- Significant improvement in braking performance and vehicle stability
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Effective performance when studded for heavy-duty or commercial plowing applications
Cons
- Noticeable road noise on dry or wet pavement
- Potential for decreased fuel economy
- Some users desire a more aggressive tread pattern for extreme conditions
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (Chevy 2500, F-150) report significant improvements in winter capability, particularly when used for plowing.
- Users note that the tires can be a tight fit on stock rims for certain full-size trucks, though they maintain a good seal in cold temperatures.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | B · General Grabber Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 45 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 12/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
General
Winner: General Grabber Arctic — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
General Grabber Arctic scores 91 vs 67 on wet.
General Grabber Arctic scores 89 vs 65 on handling.
General Grabber Arctic scores 89 vs 68 on dry.
General Grabber Arctic scores 88 vs 76 on snow.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.