89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
77/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
86/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
General Grabber Arctic vs Hankook Winter i*cept RS — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Grabber Arctic — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Hankook Winter i*cept RS if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Grabber Arctic leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Grabber Arctic | Winter i*cept RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Grabber Arctic leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Grabber Arctic | Winter i*cept RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Grabber Arctic | Winter i*cept RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 98 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Grabber Arctic leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Grabber Arctic | Winter i*cept RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Grabber Arctic | Winter i*cept RS |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept RS leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Grabber Arctic | Winter i*cept RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Grabber Arctic leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Grabber Arctic | Winter i*cept RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 77 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber Arctic | Hankook Winter i*cept RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 82 |
| Dry | 89 | 80 |
| Wet | 91 | 77 |
| Snow | 88 | – |
| Comfort | 95 | 82 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | 90 |
| Handling | 89 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Grabber Arctic is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that offers exceptional traction on snow and ice at a competitive price point. While some users note increased road noise and a slight impact on fuel economy, the consensus highlights its reliability and superior stopping power compared to all-season alternatives.
Pros
- Excellent traction on packed snow, ice, and unplowed surfaces
- Significant improvement in braking performance and vehicle stability
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Effective performance when studded for heavy-duty or commercial plowing applications
Cons
- Noticeable road noise on dry or wet pavement
- Potential for decreased fuel economy
- Some users desire a more aggressive tread pattern for extreme conditions
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (Chevy 2500, F-150) report significant improvements in winter capability, particularly when used for plowing.
- Users note that the tires can be a tight fit on stock rims for certain full-size trucks, though they maintain a good seal in cold temperatures.
The Hankook Winter i cept RS is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in snow and cold weather conditions. Users consistently praise its affordability and impressive traction, though it is noted to be less suited for high-speed motorway driving or warm, dry pavement.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and confidence in snowy conditions
- High value-for-money proposition
- Low rolling resistance contributing to improved fuel efficiency
- Durable tread life even with spirited driving
Cons
- Not optimized for high-speed motorway performance
- Soft compound feels unstable on dry, warm road surfaces
- Limited performance in non-winter conditions
Observations
- Users driving compact hatchbacks like the Alfa 147 and Fiat Grande Punto report excellent fuel economy gains compared to summer tires.
- The tire is highly recommended for rural or out-of-town commuters who encounter frequent snow rather than long-distance highway drivers.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber Arctic | B · Hankook Winter i*cept RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
General
82
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: General Grabber Arctic — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Hankook Winter i*cept RS if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber Arctic scores 91 vs 77 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber Arctic scores 95 vs 82 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber Arctic scores 89 vs 77 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber Arctic scores 89 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · General Grabber Arctic
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*cept RS
More comparisons
Also compared with
General Grabber Arctic also compared with
Hankook Winter i*cept RS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.