82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
67/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
91/100
253 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
General Grabber A/TX vs General Grabber HTS — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
General
General Grabber HTS
95
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
95/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Grabber HTS — better snow, comfort and dry. Pick the General Grabber A/TX if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Grabber HTS leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
| America's Tire owners | 96 | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Grabber HTS leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 70 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 84 |
| America's Tire owners | 91 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Grabber HTS leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 59 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 75 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Grabber HTS leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 67 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 83 |
| America's Tire owners | 89 | 88 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Grabber HTS leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 81 |
| America's Tire owners | 86 | 87 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Grabber HTS leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 100 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
| America's Tire owners | 89 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Grabber A/TX leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 80 |
| America's Tire owners | 91 | 89 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 95 |
| Dry | 81 | 96 |
| Wet | 81 | 94 |
| Snow | 70 | 98 |
| Comfort | 75 | 94 |
| Noise | 86 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 98 |
| Handling | 90 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
95
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Grabber A/Tx is widely regarded as a high-performing, cost-effective alternative to premium all-terrain tires like the BFGoodrich KO2. Users consistently praise its exceptional traction in snow, ice, and wet conditions, as well as its surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride on pavement. While most owners report excellent durability, a minority of users have experienced faster-than-expected tread wear and noted that the aggressive tread pattern can pick up and throw small rocks.
Pros
- Outstanding winter and wet weather traction
- Competitive pricing compared to premium competitors
- Low road noise and high ride comfort for an all-terrain tire
- Rugged, aggressive aesthetic with effective rim protection
- Strong off-road capability in mud, gravel, and deep snow
Cons
- Tread pattern prone to picking up and throwing small rocks
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy for many users
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Occasional reports of 'tread squirm' or handling instability, particularly when new or under-inflated
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (2500/3500 series) generally report high satisfaction with towing stability and load-bearing performance when using Load Range E tires.
- Users with larger, wider tire sizes (e.g., 305/12.5R17) occasionally reported highway wandering or tracking issues, suggesting sensitivity to alignment and tire pressure in wider footprints.
- Some SUV and light truck owners noted a significant drop in fuel economy, likely due to the tire's weight and aggressive compound.
The General Grabber H/TS is widely regarded as a high-value, reliable all-season tire that delivers consistent performance across various weather conditions. Users frequently praise its affordability and effectiveness in rain and winter environments, making it a practical choice for daily driving.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Strong performance in wet and icy conditions
- Reliable all-season traction
- High level of user satisfaction regarding overall quality
Cons
- Limited availability or marketing discrepancies in non-US markets
- Lack of 3-peak mountain snowflake branding in certain regions despite capable winter performance
Observations
- Users operating the tire on rugged vehicles like the Land Rover Defender report positive experiences with road-oriented performance in standard sizes.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community members frequently praise the General Grabber A/TX for offering a lightweight, standard (SL) or lower load range option in larger sizes like 33" (275/70R18), avoiding the heavy weight and harsh ride of E-rated alternatives. Drivers appreciate their aggressive tread, good snow traction, and ability to help conserve fuel economy compared to heavier tires. They are often compared favorably against competitors like the BFGoodrich KO2, Falken Wildpeak, and Nitto Terra Grappler.
r/4Runner
·16 upvotes ·2020-10-11
“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
r/f150
·15 upvotes ·2023-11-05
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
r/f150
·14 upvotes ·2021-09-13
“Thoughts on the “General Grabber A/TX” Tire? I’m thinking about getting it in a 33” SL rated 275/70r18. This tire comes in at 46Lbs which is super light. $915ish for 4! It’s the only 33”, snow rated, All Terrain, C/SL load range I could find. All the other 33”s are E rated coming in around 60lbs.”
r/Crosstrek
·12 upvotes ·2025-04-12
“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
Top themes
#Standard Load Weight Benefits#Snow and Winter Traction#Size Availability#Fuel Economy Conservation#Comparisons to Competitors#Aggressive Tread Design
Based on 9 community posts
Tire B
Mixed
General Grabber HTS
The General Grabber HTS (and HTS60) is generally viewed as a solid, budget-friendly highway tire backed by Continental, appealing to truck and SUV owners who stick primarily to paved roads. While many users appreciate their value, comfortable ride, and quiet highway performance, others note concerns regarding puncture susceptibility and limited capabilities in severe winter conditions.
r/HyundaiSantaFe
·8 upvotes ·2025-03-11
“New shoes - General Grabber HTS 60’s on 2009 Santa Fe 2nd owner in my family after my grandfather, 124k and going strong Read more”
r/tires
·5 upvotes ·2024-12-04
“How have you never heard of general? They are a popular sub brand of continental The generals are great value and good quality midrange tires, the grabber hts is their highway tire, designed for road use on light trucks and SUVs”
r/tires
·4 upvotes ·2024-12-04
“General Grabbers I found a guy on marketplace who bought some general grabber HTS for his truck and they didn’t fit so he’s selling them. They’re 11/32 tread life and he’ll take $350 for them. They’re my size but I’ve never heard of the brand. I have a 4Runner in Florida so no snow but is this a good deal for that brand? Read more”
r/F150Lightning
·3 upvotes ·2023-05-28
“I honestly think the Grabber HTS tires are weak to punctures Just spent $320 at Firestone I was not expecting to pay after only 5400 miles. The stock Grabber HTS tires are supposedly good for up to 50,000 miles IIRC. I barely made it 10% on one of them. This wasn’t the first time the tire picked up a small screw either. First time I got lucky and Discount Tire extracted it without needing repair because it didn’t make it deep into the tread. But last week I wasn’t lucky. Passenger front tire picked up a screw and sure enough, it went in. And it was only about 1.5” from the sidewall so they wouldn’t repair it. I went to Firestone and picked up a Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra. Not a “great” tire but at least I have a road hazard warranty, something the General Grabber tires don’t have. I’m sure someone will chime in about having zero issues after a million miles with their Grabber HTS but honestly, I haven’t had a legit puncture since 2007 and at that time I was poor so my car always had recycled/used/mismatched tires. I also noticed the tires on my Lightning ALWAYS have gravel and small rocks wedged in between the treads even though the truck is on city streets mainly. I never see that on my other cars.”
Top themes
#value and pricing#highway performance#continental backing#puncture resistance#winter weather limitations#tread life durability
Based on 7 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | — | 7 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | 11 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | 640 A B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 44 - 80 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
General
95
/ 100
General
Winner: General Grabber HTS — better snow, comfort and dry. Pick the General Grabber A/TX if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
General Grabber HTS scores 98 vs 70 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber HTS scores 94 vs 75 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber HTS scores 96 vs 81 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
General Grabber HTS scores 100 vs 86 on noise.
Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · General Grabber HTS
More comparisons
Also compared with
General Grabber A/TX also compared with
General Grabber HTS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.