88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
122 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
General Grabber UHP vs Michelin CrossClimate SUV — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
81/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
78/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Grabber UHP — better noise, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 99 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 95 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 86 |
| America's Tire owners | 95 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate SUV leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 93 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 94 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 86 |
| America's Tire owners | 88 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 60 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 83 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 81 |
| America's Tire owners | 89 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 32
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 57 |
| America's Tire owners | 89 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 71 |
| America's Tire owners | 82 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 75 |
| America's Tire owners | 93 | – |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber UHP | Michelin CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 79 |
| Dry | 94 | 94 |
| Wet | 88 | 90 |
| Snow | – | 69 |
| Comfort | 88 | 81 |
| Noise | 89 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 72 |
| Handling | 90 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Grabber UHP is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented tire for SUVs and light trucks, frequently praised for its excellent wet and dry traction. While many users report a comfortable, quiet ride and impressive longevity, some note that performance can degrade in terms of noise and balance as the tread wears down, and it is generally not recommended for severe winter conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry road traction
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium brands
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Aggressive, aesthetically pleasing tread design
- Strong tread life and durability for many users
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Potential for balancing issues or vibrations
- Poor performance in deep snow or mud
- Susceptibility to flat-spotting in cold temperatures
- Tendency for tread blocks to degrade or perish at low tread depths
Observations
- Users with heavy trucks and SUVs (e.g., Tundra, Sierra, Ram) consistently report improved handling and road manners compared to OEM tires.
- Owners of lowered vehicles or those using larger rim diameters (20-22 inches) occasionally report fitment issues like rubbing at full lock.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Suzuki Jimny) noted improvements in fuel efficiency and overall ride comfort.
The Michelin CrossClimate SUV is widely regarded as a highly capable all-weather tire that excels in providing confidence-inspiring grip across diverse conditions, including rain, slush, and light snow. While the majority of users praise its quiet operation and ride comfort, a notable minority reports issues with increased road noise over time and a firmer-than-expected ride quality.
Pros
- Exceptional all-weather traction, particularly in wet, cold, and light snow conditions.
- High levels of ride comfort and low cabin noise for most users.
- Strong durability and longevity with minimal tread wear reported by many owners.
- Significant performance improvement over budget or standard OEM tires.
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise or 'growling' as the tire ages.
- Ride quality can feel overly firm or harsh on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Some users noted a decline in wet-weather performance as the tire reaches the end of its life.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
Observations
- Users with 103 XL load-rated tires reported a harsher, 'droning' ride, suggesting potential incompatibility with specific suspension setups.
- Drivers of larger SUVs (e.g., Audi Q3, Lexus RX) frequently report significant improvements in handling and noise reduction compared to factory-fitted tires.
- Some users noted a slight increase in fuel consumption immediately following installation.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber UHP | B · Michelin CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 - 360 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
General
79
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: General Grabber UHP — better noise, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
General Grabber UHP scores 89 vs 57 on noise.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber UHP scores 90 vs 75 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber UHP scores 83 vs 72 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber UHP scores 88 vs 81 on comfort.
Tire A · General Grabber UHP
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
General Grabber UHP also compared with
Michelin CrossClimate SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.