88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
122 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
General Grabber UHP vs Michelin Latitude Tour HP — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
32 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Grabber UHP — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 79 |
| America's Tire owners | 95 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 66 |
| America's Tire owners | 88 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 64 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 59 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 76 |
| America's Tire owners | 89 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| America's Tire owners | 89 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 69 |
| America's Tire owners | 82 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Grabber UHP | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 67 |
| America's Tire owners | 93 | – |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber UHP | Michelin Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 71 |
| Dry | 94 | 79 |
| Wet | 88 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 59 |
| Comfort | 88 | 76 |
| Noise | 89 | – |
| Treadwear | 83 | 69 |
| Handling | 90 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Grabber UHP is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented tire for SUVs and light trucks, frequently praised for its excellent wet and dry traction. While many users report a comfortable, quiet ride and impressive longevity, some note that performance can degrade in terms of noise and balance as the tread wears down, and it is generally not recommended for severe winter conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry road traction
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium brands
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Aggressive, aesthetically pleasing tread design
- Strong tread life and durability for many users
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Potential for balancing issues or vibrations
- Poor performance in deep snow or mud
- Susceptibility to flat-spotting in cold temperatures
- Tendency for tread blocks to degrade or perish at low tread depths
Observations
- Users with heavy trucks and SUVs (e.g., Tundra, Sierra, Ram) consistently report improved handling and road manners compared to OEM tires.
- Owners of lowered vehicles or those using larger rim diameters (20-22 inches) occasionally report fitment issues like rubbing at full lock.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Suzuki Jimny) noted improvements in fuel efficiency and overall ride comfort.
The Michelin Latitude Tour HP presents a polarized user experience, often praised for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and longevity on specific premium vehicles. However, a significant portion of users report inconsistent tread life, premature sidewall cracking, and disappointing wet-weather performance, leading to a mixed consensus regarding its value proposition.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
- High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications
- Stable and predictable performance on highway driving
Cons
- Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
- Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
- Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
- High price point relative to performance longevity
Observations
- Users of the Land Rover Freelander reported significant mechanical issues and vibrations when replacing older Michelin Synchrone tires with the Latitude Tour HP, likely due to diameter differences.
- Owners of premium SUVs like the Porsche Macan generally report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity, whereas owners of mid-market SUVs like the Ford Escape and Honda CR-V frequently report rapid tread wear.
- Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to vehicle suspension health, suggesting that perceived handling issues may be exacerbated by worn shock absorbers.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber UHP | B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 - 360 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
General
71
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: General Grabber UHP — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber UHP scores 90 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber UHP scores 88 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber UHP scores 94 vs 79 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber UHP scores 83 vs 69 on treadwear.
Tire A · General Grabber UHP
Tire B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP
More comparisons
Also compared with
General Grabber UHP also compared with
Michelin Latitude Tour HP also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.