89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
43 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs General Grabber UHP — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
122 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Continental ExtremeContact Sport and General Grabber UHP are within 2 points overall. Continental ExtremeContact Sport is stronger on treadwear and comfort. General Grabber UHP is stronger on handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Grabber UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 90 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 95 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Grabber UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 85 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 88 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Grabber UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 85 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 89 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Grabber UHP |
|---|---|---|
| America's Tire owners | – | 89 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Grabber UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 86 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 82 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Grabber UHP leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Grabber UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 76 |
| America's Tire owners | – | 93 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact Sport | General Grabber UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 88 |
| Dry | 95 | 94 |
| Wet | 90 | 88 |
| Snow | 87 | – |
| Comfort | 91 | 88 |
| Noise | 91 | 89 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 83 |
| Handling | 80 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ExtremeContact Sport is widely regarded as a premier ultra-high-performance summer tire that excels in balancing daily driving comfort with aggressive handling capabilities. Users consistently praise its superior wet and dry grip, low noise levels, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors, though some enthusiasts note a softer sidewall that can slightly compromise steering precision.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Excellent value-to-performance ratio
- Strong performance even as tread wears down
Cons
- Softer sidewall can lead to a slight delay in steering response
- Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose performance during sustained high-heat track sessions
- Poor performance in cold temperatures (below 50°F)
- Potential for flat-spotting if left stationary in cold weather
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent synergy with the tire's handling characteristics, though some BRZ owners found the sidewall too soft for their specific suspension geometry.
- Drivers transitioning from factory run-flat tires on vehicles like the BMW Z4 noted a transformative improvement in ride quality and stability.
- EV owners noted that the tire handles the high torque and weight of electric vehicles well, though they remain mindful of accelerated tread wear under enthusiastic driving.
The General Grabber UHP is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented tire for SUVs and light trucks, frequently praised for its excellent wet and dry traction. While many users report a comfortable, quiet ride and impressive longevity, some note that performance can degrade in terms of noise and balance as the tread wears down, and it is generally not recommended for severe winter conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry road traction
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium brands
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Aggressive, aesthetically pleasing tread design
- Strong tread life and durability for many users
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Potential for balancing issues or vibrations
- Poor performance in deep snow or mud
- Susceptibility to flat-spotting in cold temperatures
- Tendency for tread blocks to degrade or perish at low tread depths
Observations
- Users with heavy trucks and SUVs (e.g., Tundra, Sierra, Ram) consistently report improved handling and road manners compared to OEM tires.
- Owners of lowered vehicles or those using larger rim diameters (20-22 inches) occasionally report fitment issues like rubbing at full lock.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Suzuki Jimny) noted improvements in fuel efficiency and overall ride comfort.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport | B · General Grabber UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 AA A | 320 - 360 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Continental
88
/ 100
General
Too close to call: Continental ExtremeContact Sport and General Grabber UHP are within 2 points overall. Continental ExtremeContact Sport is stronger on treadwear and comfort. General Grabber UHP is stronger on handling.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber UHP scores 90 vs 80 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 87 vs 83 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 91 vs 88 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Tire B · General Grabber UHP
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ExtremeContact Sport also compared with
General Grabber UHP also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.