Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Goodyear

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
13 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
86
Comfort
82
Noise
80
Treadwear
72
Handling
100

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS71 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
84/100
13 professional tests
User signal (40%)
77/100
84 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
83
Comfort
74
Noise
92
Treadwear
71
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS71 if noise matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV leads by 10
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
91
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
81
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
Professional tests (TWG score) – 79
Tyre Reviews owners 100 85

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV leads by 3
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
86
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
83
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
Professional tests (TWG score) – 85
Tyre Reviews owners 100 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV leads by 8
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
82
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
74
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
Professional tests (TWG score) – 74
Tyre Reviews owners 90 73

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS71 leads by 12
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
80
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
92
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
Professional tests (TWG score) – 92

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV leads by 1
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
72
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
71
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
Tyre Reviews owners 65 71

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV leads by 21
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
100
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
79
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVEcsta PS71
Tyre Reviews owners 100 79
DriverReviews owners 82 82

Scores at a glance

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV vs Kumho Ecsta PS71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUVKumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 84 79
Dry 91 81
Wet 86 83
Comfort 82 74
Noise 80 92
Treadwear 72 71
Handling 100 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV is highly regarded for its exceptional grip and handling characteristics, particularly in both wet and dry conditions. While it is frequently praised as a top-tier performance tire that maintains the intended driving dynamics of high-end vehicles, users consistently note that this performance comes at the cost of rapid tread wear.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
  • Superior braking performance
  • Precise cornering and turn-in response
  • Consistent handling characteristics for performance-oriented vehicles

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short service life
  • High price point
  • Rubber compound hardening toward the end of the tire's life

Observations

  • Owners of performance vehicles like the Porsche Cayman report that the tire is well-matched to factory suspension tuning, maintaining intended handling consistency.
  • Users report a relatively short lifespan of 15,000 to 25,000 kilometers, suggesting the tire is optimized for performance over longevity.
Tire B Kumho Ecsta PS71

The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Predictable handling and cornering feedback
  • Strong aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Reports of road noise and droning at highway speeds
  • Inconsistent manufacturing quality (balancing issues and 'egg-shaped' tires)
  • Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'floaty' or unstable feel for some drivers
  • Variable tread life depending on vehicle type and driving style

Observations

  • Users with high-torque RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW, Jaguar) generally report high satisfaction with grip levels, though some note faster rear-tire wear.
  • Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., MX-5) occasionally report a 'floaty' sensation due to tread block movement, which can be unsettling during spirited driving.
  • Some users on larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) report increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Mixed

Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Tire wear and longevity#UHP performance characteristics#Comparison with premium brands#Sidewall width and markings#Tire pressure management

Based on 19 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG240 A - AA A—
SidewallRaised Black LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear

Kumho

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS71 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV scores 100 vs 79 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 92 vs 80 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV scores 91 vs 81 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV scores 82 vs 74 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.