85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
94/100
20 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
250 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Michelin Energy EV — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
54
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
54/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Energy EV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 68 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Energy EV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Energy EV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 58 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Energy EV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 46
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Energy EV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 33 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Energy EV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 58 |
| DriverReviews owners | 88 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Michelin Energy EV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 54 |
| Dry | 88 | 68 |
| Wet | 90 | 63 |
| Snow | 52 | – |
| Comfort | 82 | 58 |
| Noise | 72 | – |
| Treadwear | 79 | 33 |
| Handling | 88 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
85
/ 100
Tire A
54
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is widely regarded as a top-tier, high-performance all-rounder that excels in both wet and dry conditions. Users frequently praise its predictable handling, strong grip, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding road noise and inconsistent tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling at the limit
- High value-for-money proposition
- Strong braking performance
- Good rim protection features
Cons
- Noticeable road noise on certain surfaces
- Tread life can be inconsistent, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride on rough roads
- Occasional reports of quality control issues like balancing difficulties
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 5 consistently report a massive improvement in ride comfort and steering feel.
- Drivers of heavier or high-torque vehicles (e.g., 300hp+ sedans) report faster tread wear, though many still praise the tire's ability to manage power delivery.
- Some users on lower-profile setups (18-20 inch) noted increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections compared to smaller, higher-profile configurations.
The Michelin Energy EV is generally regarded as a specialized, efficiency-focused tire that offers competent dry and wet grip for small electric vehicles like the Renault Zoe. However, user consensus is heavily marred by reports of premature structural degradation, high susceptibility to punctures, and a disproportionately high price point relative to its longevity.
Pros
- Commendable grip levels in both dry and wet conditions
- Effective contribution to vehicle range maximization
- Performance comparable to higher-tier performance tires despite eco-focused design
Cons
- High susceptibility to sidewall damage and punctures
- Premature aging, including cracking and block degradation
- Rapid tread wear on front-wheel-drive configurations
- High retail price for a small-diameter tire
Observations
- Users of the Renault Zoe frequently report that the front tires suffer from significantly faster wear and structural issues compared to the rear tires.
- The tire's thin sidewall construction is a recurring point of failure for urban driving environments involving curbs.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | B · Michelin Energy EV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Electric Vehicle tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 16 | — |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7 - 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 - 500 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
85
/ 100
Goodyear
54
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 79 vs 33 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 88 vs 58 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 90 vs 63 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 82 vs 58 on comfort.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire B · Michelin Energy EV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 also compared with
Michelin Energy EV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.