90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
92/100
67 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Kumho Ecsta KH11 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 64 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 73 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 66 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Kumho Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 72 |
| Dry | 95 | 72 |
| Wet | 93 | 64 |
| Snow | 88 | – |
| Comfort | 94 | 73 |
| Noise | 91 | – |
| Treadwear | 91 | 83 |
| Handling | 77 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
90
/ 100
Tire A
72
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented touring tire for SUVs and light trucks. Users consistently praise its quiet ride, smooth handling, and excellent price-to-performance ratio, often comparing it favorably to premium brands like Michelin. While most drivers report strong all-weather traction, a minority of users have expressed concerns regarding wet-weather cornering stability and variable tread life.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry and wet road handling
- Easy to balance during installation
Cons
- Occasional reports of wet-weather cornering instability
- Inconsistent tread life expectations
- Noticeable road noise on specific surfaces like concrete
- Slight vibration when cold
Observations
- Owners of full-size SUVs and trucks (e.g., Ford F-150, Range Rover, Armada) frequently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Drivers of compact SUVs like the Ford Kuga report mixed experiences, with some praising the smooth ride while others note a lack of confidence in sharp, wet cornering.
The Kumho Ecsta KH11 presents a polarized user experience, with feedback ranging from high praise for longevity and value to significant criticism regarding handling and wet-weather performance. While some drivers report exceptional tread life and reliable grip, others express concerns over sidewall stability and inconsistent performance, particularly on performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High value-for-money compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry and wet road traction for daily commuting
- Consistent fuel economy
Cons
- Weak sidewall construction leading to poor handling feedback
- Inconsistent grip levels in wet conditions
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Lack of confidence during spirited driving
Observations
- Users driving heavier executive sedans reported high satisfaction with long-distance comfort and tread life.
- Performance-oriented vehicle owners noted significant dissatisfaction with sidewall stiffness and handling precision.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | B · Kumho Ecsta KH11 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 17 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
90
/ 100
Hankook
72
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 93 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 95 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 94 vs 73 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 66 on handling.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KH11
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 also compared with
Kumho Ecsta KH11 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.