62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
75/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
65/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Firestone Multihawk 2 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Multihawk 2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 52 | 65 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 64 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 72 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 52 | 68 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Multihawk 2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 65 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Multihawk 2 | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 71 |
| Dry | 82 | 78 |
| Wet | 52 | 77 |
| Comfort | 64 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 68 |
| Handling | 75 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 8% #12/14 · 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 | 20% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | -11.7 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Multihawk 2 is generally regarded as a budget-friendly, dry-weather performer that offers good comfort and low noise levels. However, it receives significant criticism for its performance in wet conditions, with multiple users reporting dangerous levels of traction loss and unpredictable handling during rain.
Pros
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- High levels of ride comfort
- Low road noise
- Competitive price point
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- Unpredictable handling and tendency to slide on wet surfaces
- Lack of audible feedback when reaching the limit of grip
- Concerns regarding tread wear longevity
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance characteristics are highly dependent on climate, with dry-weather satisfaction being high in arid regions.
- Drivers reported significant rear-end instability when the tires were fitted to the rear axle in wet conditions.
The Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, value-oriented tire that offers competent dry-weather performance and respectable longevity for daily commuting. While many users appreciate its affordability and fuel efficiency, the consensus is polarized regarding its noise levels and wet-weather confidence, with several reports of premature road noise and inconsistent grip in adverse conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good dry-weather traction and handling
- High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability for many users
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Stiff ride quality and lack of comfort
- Potential for premature dry rot or accelerated wear in specific conditions
Observations
- Users transitioning from larger wheels (17-inch) to smaller diameters (15-inch) reported a significant reduction in road noise.
- Drivers of light city vehicles reported better-than-average tread longevity compared to heavier or more powerful vehicle applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Multihawk 2 | B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Firestone
71
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Firestone Multihawk 2 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 77 vs 52 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 68 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Multihawk 2 scores 75 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Multihawk 2 scores 82 vs 78 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone Multihawk 2
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone Multihawk 2 also compared with
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.