83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
32 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Optimo 4S vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Optimo 4S — better wet, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Optimo 4S leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Optimo 4S | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Optimo 4S leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | Optimo 4S | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 53 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Optimo 4S | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 52 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Optimo 4S leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Optimo 4S | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 69 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Optimo 4S leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Optimo 4S | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Optimo 4S leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Optimo 4S | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo 4S | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 65 |
| Dry | 86 | 75 |
| Wet | 86 | 55 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | 88 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 64 |
| Handling | 78 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
65
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Optimo 4S is widely regarded as a highly capable all-weather tire that effectively bridges the gap between dedicated summer and winter rubber. Users consistently praise its convenience, strong wet-weather performance, and reliable traction in snow, making it a popular choice for drivers in variable climates who wish to avoid seasonal tire changes.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in snow and icy conditions
- Strong performance in wet weather and standing water
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good value for money compared to premium alternatives
- Convenience of year-round usage without seasonal swaps
Cons
- Dry road handling can feel slightly compromised compared to dedicated summer tires
- Some reports of increased noise levels when the tires are brand new
- Occasional reports of uneven tread wear or balancing issues
- Limited availability in certain larger rim sizes
Observations
- Users running lower-profile tires (e.g., 50-series) noted a harsher ride quality, with some recommending lower pressures or higher-profile alternatives for rougher roads.
- Drivers of front-wheel-drive vehicles noted that while the tires perform well, using them only on the front axle can lead to handling imbalances (oversteer) in deep snow.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo 4S | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Hankook
65
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Hankook Optimo 4S — better wet, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 86 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 88 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 78 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 86 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo 4S
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Optimo 4S also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.