71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
90 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler vs Kumho Ecsta 712 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
57
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler | Ecsta 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 69 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler | Ecsta 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 42 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler | Ecsta 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 50 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta 712 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler | Ecsta 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 74 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler | Ecsta 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 47 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | Kumho Ecsta 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 57 |
| Dry | 90 | 69 |
| Wet | 58 | 42 |
| Comfort | 74 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 74 |
| Handling | 70 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
57
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force series, particularly the Rival S 1.5, is widely regarded as a top-tier, competition-focused 200-treadwear tire that excels in autocross and track environments. While users praise its exceptional dry grip, rapid warm-up, and predictable handling, it is generally considered a specialized tool that requires heat to perform optimally and can be noisy or uncomfortable for daily street use.
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
- Rapid warm-up time, ideal for autocross
- Predictable handling and driver feedback at the limit
- Competitive tread life compared to other extreme performance tires
- Available in a wide range of sizes, including large fitments for high-performance vehicles
Cons
- Poor performance and safety in wet or cold conditions
- High noise levels during street driving
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose grip during extended track sessions if overheated
- Stiff ride quality that sacrifices comfort for performance
Observations
- Users with heavy vehicles (e.g., 3800 lbs+) report good performance but note the tires can get greasy during long sprint sessions.
- Miata and other lightweight sports car owners frequently cite these as a benchmark for autocross, noting they are significantly more durable than competing tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R.
- Staggered fitments are often used to balance handling characteristics, particularly on rear-wheel-drive platforms to prevent oversteer.
The Kumho Ecsta 712 is widely regarded as a budget-oriented tire that offers acceptable performance in dry conditions but suffers from significant safety concerns in wet weather. While some users appreciate its value and longevity, the consensus among enthusiasts and daily drivers alike is that its unpredictable handling and poor traction in rain make it a subpar choice compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Highly competitive price point
- Better-than-average tread life compared to some premium performance tires
- Acceptable dry weather handling for casual driving
- Low road noise reported by some users
Cons
- Dangerous and unpredictable wet weather traction
- High levels of road noise and harsh ride quality
- Poor steering feedback and tendency for understeer/oversteer
- Reports of premature structural failure, such as tires going 'out of round'
Observations
- High-horsepower vehicles (e.g., R33 Skyline, 300+ bhp coupes) frequently report dangerous handling characteristics in wet conditions.
- Users noted a measurable drop in fuel economy immediately following installation.
- The tire compound appears to harden significantly as it wears, leading to a drastic reduction in performance over time.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | B · Kumho Ecsta 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
BFGoodrich
57
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 74 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 70 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 90 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 58 vs 42 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta 712
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler also compared with
Kumho Ecsta 712 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.