Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | g-Force Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 84 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | g-Force Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 78 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | g-Force Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | g-Force Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 73 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | g-Force Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 93 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | g-Force Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 71 |
| Dry | 80 | 90 |
| Wet | 67 | 58 |
| Snow | 20 | – |
| Comfort | 50 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 72 |
| Handling | 57 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The BFGoodrich g-Force series, particularly the Rival S 1.5, is widely regarded as a top-tier, competition-focused 200-treadwear tire that excels in autocross and track environments. While users praise its exceptional dry grip, rapid warm-up, and predictable handling, it is generally considered a specialized tool that requires heat to perform optimally and can be noisy or uncomfortable for daily street use.
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
- Rapid warm-up time, ideal for autocross
- Predictable handling and driver feedback at the limit
- Competitive tread life compared to other extreme performance tires
- Available in a wide range of sizes, including large fitments for high-performance vehicles
Cons
- Poor performance and safety in wet or cold conditions
- High noise levels during street driving
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose grip during extended track sessions if overheated
- Stiff ride quality that sacrifices comfort for performance
Observations
- Users with heavy vehicles (e.g., 3800 lbs+) report good performance but note the tires can get greasy during long sprint sessions.
- Miata and other lightweight sports car owners frequently cite these as a benchmark for autocross, noting they are significantly more durable than competing tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R.
- Staggered fitments are often used to balance handling characteristics, particularly on rear-wheel-drive platforms to prevent oversteer.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | High Performance Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
BFGoodrich
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if wet and treadwear matter most to you.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 74 vs 50 on comfort.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 70 vs 57 on handling.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 90 vs 80 on dry.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 67 vs 58 on wet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.