Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Yokohama ADVAN A048 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
258 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
81
Snow
79
Comfort
83
Noise
89
Treadwear
81
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN A048

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Yokohama ADVAN A048 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
96
Wet
53
Snow
Comfort
56
Noise
Treadwear
51
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN A048 if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN A048 leads by 10
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
86
B — Yokohama ADVAN A048
96
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN A048
Tire Rack owners 85
Tyre Reviews owners 83 96
SimpleTire owners 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 28
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
B — Yokohama ADVAN A048
53
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN A048
Tire Rack owners 81
Tyre Reviews owners 78 53
SimpleTire owners 87

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
B — Yokohama ADVAN A048
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN A048
SimpleTire owners 79

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 27
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
83
B — Yokohama ADVAN A048
56
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN A048
Tire Rack owners 84
Tyre Reviews owners 78 56
SimpleTire owners 89

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
89
B — Yokohama ADVAN A048
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN A048
SimpleTire owners 89

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 30
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
B — Yokohama ADVAN A048
51
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN A048
Tire Rack owners 82
Tyre Reviews owners 75 51
SimpleTire owners 88

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN A048 leads by 2
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
B — Yokohama ADVAN A048
81
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN A048
Tyre Reviews owners 79 81

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Yokohama ADVAN A048: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS31Yokohama ADVAN A048
Relative Score 82 64
Dry 86 96
Wet 81 53
Snow 79
Comfort 83 56
Noise 89
Treadwear 81 51
Handling 79 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecsta PS31

The Kumho Ecsta PS31 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in daily driving comfort and quietness. While it offers impressive dry grip and reliable wet weather performance for most drivers, enthusiasts often note that its soft sidewalls result in less steering precision and reduced feedback during aggressive cornering compared to premium ultra-high-performance alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
  • Predictable and capable wet weather performance for most conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
  • Increased noise levels as the tire wears down

Observations

  • Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda Miata, Honda Civic) often praise the comfort and value, while those with heavier or more powerful vehicles report more pronounced sidewall flex and handling vagueness.
  • Drivers running low-profile sizes on rough roads report a higher susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and damage from potholes, suggesting a need for road hazard coverage.
  • The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade in comfort and noise reduction when replacing OEM run-flat tires.
Tire B Yokohama ADVAN A048

The Yokohama Advan A048 is widely regarded as a premier semi-slick tire for lightweight sports cars, particularly the Lotus and Caterham platforms. While it offers exceptional dry-weather performance and communicative feedback, users note that it requires precise pressure and temperature management to reach its full potential.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering adhesion
  • High level of steering feedback and handling precision
  • Progressive breakaway characteristics
  • Strong performance on lightweight track-focused vehicles

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear during track sessions
  • High road noise levels
  • Difficult to maintain optimal operating temperatures
  • Susceptibility to hydroplaning in deep standing water

Observations

  • Lotus-specific variants feature unique sidewall stiffness that significantly alters handling characteristics compared to standard versions.
  • Drivers of lightweight chassis report that the tire's stiff sidewalls provide excellent braking performance, often preventing ABS intervention.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 B · Yokohama ADVAN A048
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4
Rim diameters17″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″
UTQG460 A A
SidewallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN A048 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 83 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 96 vs 86 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A048

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.