Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
258 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
81
Snow
79
Comfort
83
Noise
89
Treadwear
81
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama BluEarth S34

All Season Premium Touring tires

Yokohama BluEarth S34 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
34/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
73
Wet
46
Snow
20
Comfort
50
Noise
–
Treadwear
62
Handling
43

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 13
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
86
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
73
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 85 80
Tyre Reviews owners 83 70
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 35
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
46
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 81 63
Tyre Reviews owners 78 40
SimpleTire owners 87 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 59
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
20
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners – 49
Tyre Reviews owners – 10
SimpleTire owners 79 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 33
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
83
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
50
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 84 58
Tyre Reviews owners 78 47
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
89
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
–
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31BluEarth S34
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 19
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
62
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 82 54
Tyre Reviews owners 75 65
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 36
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
43
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31BluEarth S34
Tyre Reviews owners 79 43

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Yokohama BluEarth S34: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS31Yokohama BluEarth S34
Relative Score 81 50
Dry 86 73
Wet 81 46
Snow 79 20
Comfort 83 50
Noise 89 –
Treadwear 81 62
Handling 79 43

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecsta PS31

The Kumho Ecsta PS31 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in daily driving comfort and quietness. While it offers impressive dry grip and reliable wet weather performance for most drivers, enthusiasts often note that its soft sidewalls result in less steering precision and reduced feedback during aggressive cornering compared to premium ultra-high-performance alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
  • Predictable and capable wet weather performance for most conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
  • Increased noise levels as the tire wears down

Observations

  • Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda Miata, Honda Civic) often praise the comfort and value, while those with heavier or more powerful vehicles report more pronounced sidewall flex and handling vagueness.
  • Drivers running low-profile sizes on rough roads report a higher susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and damage from potholes, suggesting a need for road hazard coverage.
  • The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade in comfort and noise reduction when replacing OEM run-flat tires.
Tire B Yokohama BluEarth S34

The Yokohama BluEarth S34 is generally viewed as an underwhelming OEM tire that prioritizes low rolling resistance over performance. While dry traction is considered adequate for daily commuting, users frequently report concerns regarding wet weather grip and excessive road noise.

Pros

  • Acceptable dry traction for standard commuting
  • Low rolling resistance design

Cons

  • Poor wet weather performance and traction
  • High levels of road noise
  • Mediocre handling characteristics

Observations

  • Commonly identified as an OEM fitment for the Toyota Prius, where users note that the tire's hard compound may contribute to handling deficiencies.
  • Users suggest that the tire's focus on efficiency may be the primary cause for the observed lack of grip in wet conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 B · Yokohama BluEarth S34
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters17″ – 18″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG460 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 79 vs 20 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 79 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 46 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 83 vs 50 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth S34

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.