Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Kumho Ecsta V720 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken Azenis FK510

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Falken Azenis FK510 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
25 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
384 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
85
Comfort
62
Noise
84
Treadwear
75
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta V720

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta V720 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
11 owner reviews
Dry
93
Wet
54
Comfort
45
Noise
–
Treadwear
50
Handling
94

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V720 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta V720 leads by 13
A — Falken Azenis FK510
80
B — Kumho Ecsta V720
93
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Ecsta V720
Professional tests (TWG score) 74 –
Tire Rack owners 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 88 93
SimpleTire owners 97 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 31
A — Falken Azenis FK510
85
B — Kumho Ecsta V720
54
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Ecsta V720
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 –
Tire Rack owners 86 –
Tyre Reviews owners 88 54
SimpleTire owners 91 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 17
A — Falken Azenis FK510
62
B — Kumho Ecsta V720
45
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Ecsta V720
Professional tests (TWG score) 49 –
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 77 45
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Falken Azenis FK510
84
B — Kumho Ecsta V720
–
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Ecsta V720
Professional tests (TWG score) 73 –
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 25
A — Falken Azenis FK510
75
B — Kumho Ecsta V720
50
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Ecsta V720
Tire Rack owners 77 –
Tyre Reviews owners 71 50
SimpleTire owners 80 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta V720 leads by 13
A — Falken Azenis FK510
81
B — Kumho Ecsta V720
94
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Ecsta V720
Tyre Reviews owners 81 94
DriverReviews owners 86 –

Scores at a glance

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Kumho Ecsta V720: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Kumho Ecsta V720
Relative Score 77 64
Dry 80 93
Wet 85 54
Comfort 62 45
Noise 84 –
Treadwear 75 50
Handling 81 94

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken Azenis FK510

The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
  • Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
  • Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down

Observations

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
  • Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
Tire B Kumho Ecsta V720

The Kumho Ecsta V720 is widely regarded as a high-value extreme performance tire that excels in dry-weather traction and steering feedback. While users appreciate its competitive pricing and capability for spirited street or casual track use, the trade-offs include rapid tread wear and significant road noise, which may deter those seeking a refined daily driving experience.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and traction for high-horsepower vehicles
  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Precise steering feedback and firm sidewall construction
  • Reliable performance for spirited street driving and casual track days

Cons

  • High levels of road noise
  • Rapid tread wear
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance, with some reports of hydroplaning
  • Lack of comfort for daily commuting

Observations

  • High-horsepower rear-wheel-drive vehicles (350hp-500hp) report excellent straight-line and cornering traction.
  • Lightweight vehicles (sub-1 ton) may experience more pronounced issues with wet-weather grip and road noise.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/TeslaModelS ·3 upvotes ·2025-11-25

“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”

r/kereta ·3 upvotes ·2024-05-12

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta V720

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Kumho Ecsta V720
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Extreme Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available68—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Kumho

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V720 if dry and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 85 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 75 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 62 vs 45 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta V720 scores 93 vs 80 on dry.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta V720

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.