71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Solus KH16 vs Nexen CP671 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen CP671 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 51 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 82 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH16 | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KH16 | Nexen CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 78 |
| Dry | 76 | 85 |
| Wet | 67 | 75 |
| Snow | 51 | – |
| Comfort | 80 | 85 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 70 |
| Handling | 70 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Solus KH16 receives highly polarized feedback, with some users praising its quiet ride and reliable multi-surface grip, while others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather performance and sidewall stability. While some owners find the tire to be a cost-effective solution for daily driving, others express frustration with inconsistent tread life and handling characteristics.
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions for many users
- Strong value proposition and cost-per-mile efficiency
- Consistent performance across various vehicle types including MPVs and hatchbacks
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewall construction leading to poor handling feedback
- Significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and safety
- Inconsistent quality control experiences
Observations
- Users operating utility vehicles reported rapid tread wear, though this was contested by manufacturer representatives citing alignment issues.
- Owners of MPVs and hatchbacks generally reported higher satisfaction with the tire's comfort and daily driving performance.
The Nexen CP671 is generally regarded as a durable, budget-friendly tire that offers reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions. While users appreciate its longevity and consistent handling, the experience is often tempered by noticeable road noise and structural aging issues over time.
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and lifespan
- Reliable traction in both wet and dry weather
- Predictable and stable handling characteristics
Cons
- Significant road noise and cabin roar
- Directional tread pattern complicates tire rotation
- Tendency for rubber cracking as the tire ages
Observations
- Demonstrated strong durability on compact diesel vehicles, achieving 30,000 miles with remaining tread depth.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KH16 | B · Nexen CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 12 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 400 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 36 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Kumho
78
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen CP671 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen CP671 scores 80 vs 70 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen CP671 scores 85 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen CP671 scores 75 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen CP671 scores 85 vs 80 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho Solus KH16
Tire B · Nexen CP671
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Solus KH16 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.