Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Agilis CrossClimate | CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 97 | 97 |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | 87 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 100% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Agilis CrossClimate | CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 92 |
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 82 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 96% | 94% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 96% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Agilis CrossClimate | CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 95 | 74 |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 87 |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 99% | 100% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Agilis CrossClimate | CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 92 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Agilis CrossClimate | CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 36 | 43 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Agilis CrossClimate | CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 81 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Agilis CrossClimate | CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 84 |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 82 |
| Dry | 97 | 94 |
| Wet | 93 | 88 |
| Snow | 94 | 79 |
| Comfort | 91 | 97 |
| Noise | 36 | 43 |
| Treadwear | 94 | 81 |
| Handling | 83 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/7 · 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #5/7 · 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test | 98% #3/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test | +0.9 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 93% #4/7 · 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test | 96% #2/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test | -2.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #2/7 · 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test | 96% #3/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test | -0.7 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 33% #3/7 · 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test | -66.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #2/7 · 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test | 100% #2/10 · 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test | -0.8 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #2/7 · 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test | -2 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #2/7 · 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test | 94% #6/10 · 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test | +1.6 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #7/7 · 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test | 96% #6/10 · 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is highly regarded by commercial van and motorhome operators for its exceptional durability, year-round versatility, and reliable traction in diverse weather conditions. Users consistently report that the tire provides a significant performance upgrade over standard commercial tires, offering impressive longevity and confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and cold environments.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong traction and handling in wet and cold weather conditions
- Excellent value proposition due to high mileage performance
- Confidence-inspiring stability for heavy-duty vehicles and motorhomes
Cons
- Reports of excessive sidewall flex or 'mushy' steering response
- Occasional low-frequency drone or noise during hard cornering
- Higher initial purchase price compared to midrange alternatives
Observations
- Motorhome owners report excellent performance stability even when fully loaded at 3.6-3.7 tons.
- Commercial van operators note significant improvements in grip and longevity compared to standard factory-fitted tires.
- The tire maintains consistent performance characteristics across extreme temperature ranges, from sub-zero conditions to 35°C heat.
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV is widely regarded as a versatile, high-performance all-season tire that excels in winter conditions and provides superior ride comfort. While most users praise its year-round reliability and traction, some report concerns regarding fuel efficiency, noise at higher speeds, and inconsistent wet-weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in snow and ice conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and noise reduction on road imperfections
- Strong durability and tread life
- Predictable handling and braking performance in dry conditions
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise at speeds exceeding 50 MPH
- Potential for reduced fuel economy in certain hybrid and ICE vehicles
- Soft sidewall construction may feel less sharp for performance-oriented driving
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip reported by a minority of users
Observations
- Users of high-torque EVs and hybrids report mixed results, with some noting significant drops in fuel economy while others praise the low rolling resistance and tread wear.
- Drivers transitioning from run-flat tires frequently report a noticeable improvement in cabin quietness and impact absorption.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community opinion on the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is generally positive regarding its winter and wet traction capabilities for heavy vans and trucks, though users note potential trade-offs in rolling resistance and tread wear. Mention of a recall regarding snow traction also introduces mixed perspectives, while commercial vehicle and RV owners frequently consider it as a top alternative.
“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”
“Agilis cross climate (LT metric) Not a ton of information in regard to this tire, but so far my experience has been extremely positive. Great traction in the wet and light snow and fuel mileage seems to have improved. I plan to update this post as I put more miles on them. They don’t have the cool factor I concerned myself with as a younger man, but they seem to be an excellent tire. Read more”
“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”
“Agilis CrossClimate all-weather cargo van tire So I had an electrician over to my house yesterday (in Michigan), and I saw his Ford Transit had the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate all-weather truck/van/cargo tire. I asked him how it was. He told me that the stock tires would get completely stuck even on plowed roads that had the tiniest bit of snow or ice left. But with the Agilis CrossClimate, he hadn't gotten stuck anymore. So I thought that was a cool story I would share. FYI, Toyo makes the Celsius Cargo, which is another all-weather tire for cargo vans and trucks. P.S. Some Agilis CrossClimate tires have a recall. Read more”
Based on 9 community posts
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Community opinion on the Michelin CrossClimate 2 (and SUV variant) is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its exceptional winter traction, severe snow service rating (3PMSF), and confidence-inspiring wet and dry grip. While a few users note minor drawbacks like a noticeable decrease in EV range/fuel efficiency, higher initial pricing, or slight road noise, the tire remains a top-tier recommendation for all-weather performance.
“Had to drive Sunday morning around midnight to the far west side of Madison. Normally 30 minutes from my house on a good day. New CC2s and a small AWD SUV made it far less treacherous than it could have been. Only took me 10 extra minutes but I didn’t lose traction or control once. 5/5 stars, will buy again.”
“New CrossClimate 2 tires almost stranded my family. Massive efficiency drop on Model Y. Just a heads-up for anyone swapping to Michelin CrossClimate 2s. Put a set on my Model Y about 3 weeks ago from Discount Tire and just did a road trip from Denver to Taos, NM with my wife and two toddlers. We charged up to 90% at the Pueblo Supercharger, and the Tesla app estimated we would arrive in Taos with 15% battery remaining. Well, the new tire efficiency hit is incredibly real. The range dropped so fast that we were tracking to hit 0% and had to make an emergency Type 2 charging stop on the way just to make sure we didn't get stranded with the kids in the car. I’m now seriously thinking about taking advantage of Discount Tire's return policy and going back to the OEM Continental ProContact RX. Has anyone else faced similar problems or massive efficiency drops when switching to the CC2s? Does the range eventually get better after a break-in period, or should I just cut my losses and swap back to the Continentals? I need something reliable for road trips with the family, so I'd love to hear your suggestions and experiences!”
“Safest among your choices is CC2, the most comfortable is Defender 2, and right into the thrash is Bridgestone. I will never trust a Bridgestone tire except the Brizzak snow tires. My previous car had Bridgestone Turanza on it when bought brand new, and the car felt like a giraffe on skates in any tricky weather. 900 miles into the new car, bought CC2s and made everything perfect. Good riddance.”
“Look at all weather tires (3PMSF rated) instead of a basic all season. Michelin CrossClimate2 is hard to beat for safety and snow grip and they’re not that loud in my experience. I put them on my wife’s Highlander and they’ve been smooth and confident in slush and highway rain. If you want something a little quieter and softer riding, Bridgestone WeatherPeak or Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive are also solid. When I priced 245/50R20 CC2s recently, Costco was around $314 per tire installed $1,256 set before tax during a promo, Tire Rack was about $302 per tire $1,208 before install and Discounted Wheel Warehouse had them closer to $279 per tire $1,116 before install so roughly $140 difference on a set before mounting”
Based on 45 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Van | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better snow, treadwear and wet. Pick the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV if noise and comfort matter most to you.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 94 vs 79 on snow.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 94 vs 81 on treadwear.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 43 vs 36 on noise.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 97 vs 91 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.