81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
16 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max — better wet, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Assurance Fuel Max leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Assurance Fuel Max leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 53 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Assurance Fuel Max leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 56 | 52 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 50 |
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Assurance Fuel Max leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 69 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 69 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Assurance Fuel Max leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Assurance Fuel Max leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Fuel Max | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 63 |
| Dry | 88 | 75 |
| Wet | 84 | 55 |
| Snow | 74 | 50 |
| Comfort | 82 | 70 |
| Noise | 87 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | 64 |
| Handling | 70 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
63
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max is widely regarded as a reliable, long-lasting tire that excels in fuel efficiency and tread longevity. While some users note average performance in terms of grip and noise, the consensus points to it being a highly practical choice for high-mileage commuters and large vehicle owners seeking value over time.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life with many users reporting over 50,000 miles
- Measurable improvements in fuel economy
- Consistent and reliable performance for daily on-road driving
- Good value proposition due to long-term durability
Cons
- Average grip and handling characteristics
- Noise levels can be slightly higher than premium touring alternatives
- Higher initial purchase price compared to some competitors
Observations
- Large SUV and truck owners, such as those driving a Yukon XL, report excellent longevity and suitability for heavy-duty on-road use.
- Users note that the fuel-saving benefits are noticeable even when only installed on the front axle of smaller sedans like the Toyota Corolla.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 7 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 580 - 620 A A - B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Goodyear
63
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max — better wet, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 84 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 74 vs 50 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 85 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 88 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.