75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Nexen Eurowin 650 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen Eurowin 650 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if handling and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eurowin 650 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Eurowin 650 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eurowin 650 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Eurowin 650 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 59 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eurowin 650 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Eurowin 650 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 65 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Eurowin 650 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Eurowin 650 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen Eurowin 650 | Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 72 |
| Dry | 80 | 72 |
| Wet | 80 | 59 |
| Comfort | 70 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 87 |
| Handling | 65 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
72
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen Eurowin 650 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that delivers reliable performance in demanding alpine conditions. Users consistently praise its impressive grip on ice and heavy snow, noting that it provides a secure driving experience at an accessible price point.
Pros
- Excellent traction and control on ice and heavy snow
- High value-for-money proposition
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Consistent performance in severe winter environments
Cons
- Limited feedback regarding dry road handling characteristics
- Brand perception may not match premium tier competitors despite performance
Observations
- Proven reliability across multiple vehicle types, including compact luxury models like the Mercedes-Benz A-Class
- Demonstrated capability in extreme alpine winter conditions over multi-year usage
The Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth is generally regarded as a competent, long-lasting original equipment tire that excels in dry-weather comfort and noise suppression. While users appreciate its longevity and predictable handling in fair conditions, it is frequently criticized for lackluster wet-weather traction and a high price point relative to its performance capabilities.
Pros
- Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
- Solid, predictable performance for daily, undemanding driving
Cons
- Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
- High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
- Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
- Lack of confidence-inspiring performance in inclement weather
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles, such as MPVs, reported satisfactory tread wear despite the vehicle's weight.
- Users noted that the tire performs adequately as an OEM fitment for standard passenger cars but lacks the performance characteristics desired for spirited driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen Eurowin 650 | B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Nexen
72
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Nexen Eurowin 650 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if handling and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen Eurowin 650 scores 80 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 78 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 87 vs 75 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen Eurowin 650 scores 80 vs 72 on dry.
Tire A · Nexen Eurowin 650
Tire B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen Eurowin 650 also compared with
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.