Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 68 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 35 |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 57 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 52 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 54 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 51 |
| Dry | 91 | 68 |
| Wet | 87 | 35 |
| Snow | 76 | – |
| Comfort | 88 | 57 |
| Noise | 91 | – |
| Treadwear | 82 | 52 |
| Handling | 80 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
- Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
- Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
- Not suitable for high-performance track applications
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
- Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
- Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
The Riken Maystorm 2 B2 is widely regarded by users as a budget-tier tire that offers acceptable performance in dry conditions but presents significant safety concerns in wet weather. The consensus among reviewers is that the tire suffers from rapid tread wear, poor wet-surface traction, and unpredictable handling, leading many to label it a false economy despite its low initial purchase price.
Pros
- Low initial purchase price
- Adequate grip and handling on dry pavement
- Generally quiet operation
Cons
- Dangerous lack of traction in wet or damp conditions
- Extremely rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Poor braking performance
- Unpredictable handling and lack of driver confidence
Observations
- Users driving heavier vehicles, such as the Citroen DS5, reported accelerated tread wear and poor performance compared to expectations.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles like the Toyota Aygo and Yaris noted a 'floaty' or unstable feeling at highway speeds.
- Owners of electric vehicles, such as the Renault Zoe, reported that the tire's lack of grip was particularly hazardous given the vehicle's torque characteristics.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen
Riken
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 35 on wet.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 57 on comfort.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 52 on treadwear.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 80 vs 54 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.