Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 59 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N FERA SUR4G vs Falken Azenis RT 615 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Azenis RT 615 leads, 63–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Azenis RT 615 +266Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Professional tests (TWG score) 62 – Reviews found online 67 64 -
73
Wet
N FERA SUR4G +1657Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Professional tests (TWG score) 76 – Reviews found online 70 53 -
59
Comfort
Azenis RT 615 +261Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 48 52 -
53
Treadwear
Azenis RT 615 +1265Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 45 64 -
56
Handling
Azenis RT 615 +864Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 56 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N FERA SUR4G | Falken Azenis RT 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 63 |
| Dry | 64 | 66 |
| Wet | 73 | 57 |
| Comfort | 59 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 65 |
| Handling | 56 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
N FERA SUR4G
63
/ 100
Azenis RT 615
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N FERA SUR4G
Pros
- Insane level of grip on both dry and wet surfaces
- Exceptional performance in unexpected rain conditions during track events
- Competitive pricing compared to alternatives like the RS4
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall tire lifespan
- Requires careful driving speeds in heavy rain after a certain threshold
Tire B Azenis RT 615
Pros
- Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
- Impressive tread life and durability, holding up well to track days and endurance racing
- Good dry grip and predictable handling for beginners learning performance driving
Cons
- Poor performance and hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
- Harder rubber compound compared to traditional semi-slicks, limiting absolute ultimate grip
- Requires careful tire pressure tuning (such as running 3-5 psi higher) to optimize performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N FERA SUR4G | B · Falken Azenis RT 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Nexen N FERA SUR4G
63
/ 100
Falken Azenis RT 615
Too close to call: Nexen N FERA SUR4G and Falken Azenis RT 615 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N FERA SUR4G is stronger on wet. Falken Azenis RT 615 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N FERA SUR4G scores 73 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Falken Azenis RT 615 scores 65 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken Azenis RT 615 scores 64 vs 56 on handling.
Tire A · Nexen N FERA SUR4G
Tire B · Falken Azenis RT 615
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.