85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
108 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Toyo Proxes CF2 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Toyo Proxes CF2 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 75 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 82 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 85 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes CF2 | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 79 |
| Dry | 88 | 81 |
| Wet | 82 | 75 |
| Comfort | 86 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 85 | 78 |
| Handling | 83 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
85
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Toyo Proxes CF2 is widely regarded as a high-value, well-rounded touring tire that excels in comfort, noise reduction, and wet-weather performance. While a small subset of users reported issues with premature hardening or structural cracking, the vast majority of drivers praise its predictable handling and impressive longevity, often comparing it favorably to more expensive premium brands.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry grip with predictable handling
- Impressive tread life and durability for daily driving
- Low rolling resistance contributing to fuel efficiency
Cons
- Reports of rubber hardening or cracking after 2-3 years in hot climates
- Soft sidewalls can feel less precise during aggressive cornering
- Requires a significant 'scrub-in' period to reach peak grip levels
- Occasional reports of structural failure or premature wear on specific vehicles
Observations
- Users with compact cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Toyota Yaris) frequently report significant improvements in ride quality and noise levels over factory-fitted tires.
- Drivers of older or lighter vehicles often highlight the tire's ability to provide a 'predictable' and 'fun' driving experience, though some note that the soft sidewalls are less suited for high-performance sports driving.
- Owners in hot climates (e.g., Greece, Cyprus) noted that the rubber compound may be prone to premature aging or cracking compared to temperate regions.
The Yokohama A539 is widely regarded as a dependable, classic-style tire that excels in providing predictable handling and reliable braking for older or smaller-displacement vehicles. While it is highly praised by owners of classic Minis and vintage hatchbacks for its cornering feedback, it is generally considered a capable all-rounder rather than a high-performance track tire.
Pros
- Excellent cornering grip and handling feedback
- Highly predictable and dependable performance
- Strong braking capabilities in both wet and dry conditions
- Well-suited for classic vehicle fitments and smaller wheel diameters
Cons
- Can struggle with traction when cold
- Limited performance in aggressive, high-power driving scenarios
- Noticeable road noise when pushed to the limit
- Wet weather performance can be inconsistent depending on vehicle weight and power
Observations
- Highly favored for classic Mini applications, particularly in 13-inch sizes, where it is considered a top-tier choice.
- Users note that while the tire performs well on lightweight vintage cars, it may exhibit wheel spin on more powerful or torque-heavy setups.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes CF2 | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
85
/ 100
Toyo
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF2 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 88 vs 81 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 82 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 85 vs 78 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 86 vs 82 on comfort.
Tire A · Toyo Proxes CF2
Tire B · Yokohama A539
More comparisons
Also compared with
Toyo Proxes CF2 also compared with
Yokohama A539 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.