tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Bridgestone Potenza S-02A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 66–59

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701 or Potenza S-02A on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 74 · 4 tests Owners 60 · 2,183 reviews

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +15
    60
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Potenza S-02A
    Professional tests (TWG score)79–
    Reviews found online7056
  2. 68

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Potenza S-02A
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online6555
  3. 37

    Snow

    Potenza S-02A +21
    58
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Potenza S-02A
    Reviews found online1450
  4. 62

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Potenza S-02A
    Professional tests (TWG score)60–
    Reviews found online6452
  5. 70

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Potenza S-02A
    Professional tests (TWG score)76–
    Reviews found online6257
  6. 69

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +11
    58
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Potenza S-02A
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online6152
  7. 72

    Handling

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +14
    58
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Potenza S-02A
    Reviews found online7258
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701Bridgestone Potenza S-02A
Relative Score 66 59
Dry 75 60
Wet 68 59
Snow 37 58
Comfort 62 61
Noise 70 63
Treadwear 69 58
Handling 72 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ADVAN Fleva V701

Potenza S-02A

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

Tire B Potenza S-02A

Pros

  • Excellent steering feedback and linear handling characteristics
  • High tread longevity and durability over extended mileage
  • Reliable dry and wet road holding performance

Cons

  • Subpar grip performance when tires are cold
  • Inconsistent reports regarding tread wear rates
  • Potential for skittish behavior in winter conditions as the tread reaches its limit
All owner themes in the Potenza S-02A review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Tire B

Bridgestone Potenza S-02A

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 B · Bridgestone Potenza S-02A
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available37—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth9/32″10/32″
UTQG300 A A140 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Bridgestone Potenza S-02A

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better dry, handling and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S-02A if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Potenza S-02A scores 58 vs 37 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 75 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 72 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 58 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza S-02A
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

66

Leads

ADVAN Fleva V701

Amazon