Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Nexen N'Fera RU5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

N'Fera RU5 is ahead, 72–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 74 · 4 tests Owners 60 · 2,183 reviews

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

Tire BNexen

N'Fera RU5

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 16 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701N'Fera RU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)79–
    Reviews found online7079
  2. 68

    Wet

    N'Fera RU5 +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701N'Fera RU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online6576
  3. 37

    Snow

    N'Fera RU5 +24
    61
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701N'Fera RU5
    Reviews found online1454
  4. 62

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU5 +13
    75
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701N'Fera RU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)60–
    Reviews found online6480
  5. 70

    Noise

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701N'Fera RU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)76–
    Reviews found online6275
  6. 69

    Treadwear

    N'Fera RU5 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701N'Fera RU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online6173
  7. 72

    Handling

    N'Fera RU5 +5
    77
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701N'Fera RU5
    Reviews found online7277
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Nexen N'Fera RU5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701Nexen N'Fera RU5
Relative Score 66 72
Dry 75 75
Wet 68 75
Snow 37 61
Comfort 62 75
Noise 70 70
Treadwear 69 70
Handling 72 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ADVAN Fleva V701

N'Fera RU5

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

Tire B N'Fera RU5

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
  • Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
  • Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads

Cons

  • Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
  • Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
  • Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N'Fera RU5

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 B · Nexen N'Fera RU5
CategorySummerSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available371
Rim diameters15″ – 20″18″
Tread depth9/32″10/32″
UTQG300 A A500 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Nexen N'Fera RU5

Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU5 — better snow, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 61 vs 37 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 75 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 75 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 77 vs 72 on handling.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire B · Nexen N'Fera RU5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Leads

N'Fera RU5

Amazon