Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Nitto NT05 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 66–53

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 74 · 4 tests Owners 60 · 2,183 reviews

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

Tire BNitto

NT05

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 43 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701NT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)79–
    Reviews found online7065
  2. 68

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +25
    43
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701NT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online6534
  3. 37

    Snow

    NT05 +1
    38
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701NT05
    Reviews found online1417
  4. 62

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +8
    54
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701NT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)60–
    Reviews found online6439
  5. 70

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701NT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)76–
    Reviews found online6258
  6. 69

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +16
    53
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701NT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online6143
  7. 72

    Handling

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +13
    59
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701NT05
    Reviews found online7259
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Nitto NT05: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701Nitto NT05
Relative Score 66 53
Dry 75 66
Wet 68 43
Snow 37 38
Comfort 62 54
Noise 70 63
Treadwear 69 53
Handling 72 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ADVAN Fleva V701

NT05

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

Tire B NT05

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits
  • Good value and competitive price point for a performance tire

Cons

  • Poor performance and traction in heavy rain or wet conditions
  • Can be noisy or develop a whistling sound at highway speeds
  • May overheat or struggle under extreme track conditions for prolonged sessions
All owner themes in the NT05 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Tire B

Nitto NT05

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 B · Nitto NT05
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3723
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″7.2/32″
UTQG300 A A200 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Nitto NT05

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 68 vs 43 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 72 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 75 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire B · Nitto NT05

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

66

Leads

ADVAN Fleva V701

Amazon