Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Yokohama AVID S33B — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
66/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
253 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
75
Snow
36
Comfort
34
Noise
52
Treadwear
78
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama AVID S33B tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
20/100
Owner ratings
Dry
64
Wet
50
Snow
34
Comfort
67
Noise
66
Treadwear
37
Handling
61

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama AVID S33B if comfort and noise matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 25
A — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
89
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
64
Why this score
SourceADVAN Fleva V701AVID S33B
Professional tests (TWG score) 90 –
Tire Rack owners 90 64
Tyre Reviews owners 85 –
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 25
A — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
75
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
50
Why this score
SourceADVAN Fleva V701AVID S33B
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tire Rack owners 80 51
Tyre Reviews owners 78 –
SimpleTire owners 79 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 2
A — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
36
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
34
Why this score
SourceADVAN Fleva V701AVID S33B
Tire Rack owners – 35
SimpleTire owners 47 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID S33B leads by 33
A — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
34
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
67
Why this score
SourceADVAN Fleva V701AVID S33B
Professional tests (TWG score) 2 –
Tire Rack owners 84 66
Tyre Reviews owners 75 –
SimpleTire owners 84 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID S33B leads by 14
A — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
52
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
66
Why this score
SourceADVAN Fleva V701AVID S33B
Professional tests (TWG score) 34 –
SimpleTire owners 83 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 41
A — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
78
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
37
Why this score
SourceADVAN Fleva V701AVID S33B
Tire Rack owners 79 39
Tyre Reviews owners 77 –
SimpleTire owners 79 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 20
A — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
81
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
61
Why this score
SourceADVAN Fleva V701AVID S33B
Tyre Reviews owners 81 –
DriverReviews owners 86 –

Scores at a glance

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Yokohama AVID S33B: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701Yokohama AVID S33B
Relative Score 66 52
Dry 89 64
Wet 75 50
Snow 36 34
Comfort 34 67
Noise 52 66
Treadwear 78 37
Handling 81 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
  • Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
  • Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
  • Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
  • Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
  • Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
  • Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.

Observations

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
  • Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
  • Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
Tire B Yokohama AVID S33B

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama AVID S33B

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 B · Yokohama AVID S33B
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available37—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama AVID S33B if comfort and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 78 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama AVID S33B scores 67 vs 34 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 89 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 75 vs 50 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire B · Yokohama AVID S33B

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.