General Grabber APT review
The General Grabber APT is widely regarded as a versatile, budget-friendly all-terrain tire that balances on-road comfort with respectable off-road capability. While many users praise its quiet highway ride and strong performance in snow and wet conditions, experiences regarding tread longevity and balancing consistency are notably polarized.
Owners rate it 12.6 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
87.3%By road tests
74.7%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 58 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The General Grabber APT is widely regarded as a versatile, budget-friendly all-terrain tire that balances on-road comfort with respectable off-road capability. While many users praise its quiet highway ride and strong performance in snow and wet conditions, experiences regarding tread longevity and balancing consistency are notably polarized.
Pros
- Excellent traction in wet, snowy, and light off-road conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an all-terrain tire
- Attractive, rugged aesthetic that enhances vehicle appearance
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Difficulty in achieving proper wheel balance, leading to vibrations
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Tendency to pick up and retain gravel in tread grooves
- Mixed performance on ice, with some users reporting poor grip
Worth knowing
- Users of full-size trucks and SUVs report varying experiences, with some achieving high mileage (70k-85k) while others note faster wear under heavy use.
- Drivers of older trucks and SUVs (e.g., 2002 F150, 3rd Gen 4Runner) frequently cite improved handling and aesthetics over stock tires.
- Some users noted a slight decrease in fuel economy (2-3 mpg) after installation, likely due to the tire's construction and weight.
2 published test appearances
Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.
HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter tires on Snow · 265/70 R17
3rd of 5
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Snow Braking | 4th of 5 | |
| Snow Traction | 2nd of 5 | |
| Snow Handling | 3rd of 5 | |
| Ice Braking | 2nd of 5 | |
| Subj. Comfort | 3rd of 5 | |
| Subj. Noise | 3rd of 5 | |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 3rd of 5 |
What's the best type of tire for your SUV or Pickup truck? HT, AT and MT compared and tested · 265/70 R17
2nd of 4
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 2nd of 4 | |
| Wet Handling | 2nd of 4 | |
| Dry Braking | 2nd of 4 | |
| Dry Handling | 1st of 4 | |
| Rolling Resistance | 2nd of 4 | |
| Straight Aqua | 2nd of 4 | |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd of 4 | |
| Subj. Comfort | 2nd of 4 | |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 2nd of 4 | |
| Dirt Handling | 2nd of 4 | |
| Gravel Handling | 3rd of 4 | |
| Subj. Dirt Handling | 2nd of 4 | |
| Tyre Weight | 3rd of 4 | |
| Subj. Gravel Handling | 3rd of 4 | |
| Mud Performance | 3rd of 4 |
General Grabber APT specs & sizes
Prices vary by size, so each one links out separately.
| Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Tread depth | 12 - 16/32″ |
| UTQG | 360 - 740 A - AA A - B |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 - 90 psi |
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.