85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter vs BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
85/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
88/100
29 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter and BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter is stronger on snow. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is stronger on handling, treadwear and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | g-Force Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | g-Force Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 89 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | g-Force Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 94 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | g-Force Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 92 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | g-Force Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 50 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | g-Force Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | g-Force Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 86 |
| Dry | 85 | 84 |
| Wet | 81 | 84 |
| Snow | 100 | 89 |
| Comfort | 84 | 85 |
| Noise | – | 50 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 87 |
| Handling | 78 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
85
/ 100
Tire A
86
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter is widely regarded as a high-performing, value-oriented winter tire that excels in deep snow, ice, and cold, wet conditions. While most users praise its exceptional traction and reliability in harsh climates, some report concerns regarding sidewall softness, noise levels, and long-term durability.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow and icy conditions
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Strong performance in cold, wet, and slushy environments
- Reliable handling on steep or challenging terrain
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and a 'wobbly' feel on dry pavement
- Increased noise levels reported by some users
- Inconsistent long-term durability, with reports of premature deformation or wear
- Performance degrades significantly in temperatures above 6-7 degrees Celsius
Observations
- Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles, such as the BMW E46, noted a significant improvement in mobility during winter conditions.
- Drivers using smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) reported high confidence and excellent water displacement on rural roads.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in severe snow and ice conditions. While users consistently praise its traction in challenging weather and its competitive pricing, some note a lack of steering feedback and reduced performance during spirited dry-road driving.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Generally low tread wear and good longevity for most drivers
Cons
- Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
- Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
- Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
- Potential for premature tread degradation under aggressive or sporty driving styles
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles and those towing trailers reported high stability and confidence in deep snow and arctic conditions.
- Users with electric power steering systems noted a lack of road feel, which can lead to understeer in front-wheel-drive vehicles with heavy front ends.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter | B · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Winter tire | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
85
/ 100
BFGoodrich
86
/ 100
BFGoodrich
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter and BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter is stronger on snow. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is stronger on handling, treadwear and wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter scores 100 vs 89 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 78 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 87 vs 83 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 84 vs 81 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.