75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
54 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama A539 — better handling and wet. Pick the Continental ComfortContact CC6 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 75 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 82 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 85 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 79 |
| Dry | 79 | 81 |
| Wet | 66 | 75 |
| Comfort | 89 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 78 |
| Handling | 71 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ComfortContact CC6 is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for noise reduction and ride comfort, effectively absorbing road imperfections and providing a serene cabin experience. While it excels in daily commuting and long-distance cruising, it is frequently criticized for its soft sidewalls and lackluster wet-weather performance, making it unsuitable for aggressive driving styles.
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
- Reliable dry-road handling for standard commuting
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
- Lack of steering feedback and stability at higher speeds
Observations
- Users with vehicles lacking factory soundproofing, such as older compact cars, report the most significant improvements in cabin quietness.
- Drivers of taller vehicles or MPVs note that the soft sidewall leads to a lack of confidence during cornering due to increased body roll.
- Performance is highly dependent on driving style; those transitioning from performance-oriented tires often find the CC6's handling characteristics too 'mushy' or unresponsive.
The Yokohama A539 is widely regarded as a dependable, classic-style tire that excels in providing predictable handling and reliable braking for older or smaller-displacement vehicles. While it is highly praised by owners of classic Minis and vintage hatchbacks for its cornering feedback, it is generally considered a capable all-rounder rather than a high-performance track tire.
Pros
- Excellent cornering grip and handling feedback
- Highly predictable and dependable performance
- Strong braking capabilities in both wet and dry conditions
- Well-suited for classic vehicle fitments and smaller wheel diameters
Cons
- Can struggle with traction when cold
- Limited performance in aggressive, high-power driving scenarios
- Noticeable road noise when pushed to the limit
- Wet weather performance can be inconsistent depending on vehicle weight and power
Observations
- Highly favored for classic Mini applications, particularly in 13-inch sizes, where it is considered a top-tier choice.
- Users note that while the tire performs well on lightweight vintage cars, it may exhibit wheel spin on more powerful or torque-heavy setups.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama A539 — better handling and wet. Pick the Continental ComfortContact CC6 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama A539 scores 85 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama A539 scores 75 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 89 vs 82 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Yokohama A539
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ComfortContact CC6 also compared with
Yokohama A539 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.