80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Dunlop Roadsmart — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
13 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Dunlop Roadsmart — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Roadsmart leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Roadsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 88 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Roadsmart leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Roadsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 85 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Roadsmart leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Roadsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 88 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiRoad Attack leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Roadsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 82 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Roadsmart leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Roadsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Dunlop Roadsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 85 |
| Dry | 83 | 88 |
| Wet | 72 | 85 |
| Comfort | 83 | 88 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 82 |
| Handling | 79 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiRoad Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance sport-touring tire that excels in dry-weather handling and offers a unique 'cold-mould' construction that minimizes warm-up time. While the majority of users praise its agility and confidence-inspiring feedback, a minority of riders report inconsistent wet-weather performance and issues with front-end stability or cupping as the tire reaches the end of its service life.
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
- Predictable handling characteristics that inspire rider confidence
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
- Limited off-road capability, prone to sliding on loose surfaces
Observations
- Users on heavier sport-touring machines like the ZZR noted that the tire's profile significantly quickens steering response compared to OEM alternatives.
- Riders on dual-sport or adventure-style bikes (e.g., KTM 1190, DRZ SM) noted that while excellent on pavement, the tire is not suitable for sandy or loose off-road conditions.
The Dunlop Roadsmart is highly regarded as a reliable, confidence-inspiring sport-touring tire that balances neutral handling with impressive wet and dry grip. While some users report uneven wear patterns or squaring off over time, the consensus highlights its significant performance improvements over older tire generations and its ability to maintain stability across varied riding conditions.
Pros
- Excellent grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Neutral and predictable steering characteristics
- High level of rider confidence during cornering
- Strong performance even when tires are cold
- Good longevity for a sport-touring compound
Cons
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off with mileage
- Soft shoulder rubber may wear faster than the center
- Occasional reports of rear wheel slippage in wet conditions for some riders
- Less dry-grip feedback compared to dedicated sport-focused tires
Observations
- High-torque bikes like the Aprilia Tuono 1000 and Suzuki Hayabusa demonstrate that the tire holds up well under aggressive, high-performance riding.
- Users transitioning from older sport-touring models (e.g., BT-020) report a transformative improvement in handling and confidence.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Dunlop Roadsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Continental
85
/ 100
Dunlop
Winner: Dunlop Roadsmart — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Dunlop Roadsmart scores 85 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Dunlop Roadsmart scores 85 vs 79 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Dunlop Roadsmart scores 88 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Dunlop Roadsmart scores 88 vs 83 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiRoad Attack
Tire B · Dunlop Roadsmart
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiRoad Attack also compared with
Dunlop Roadsmart also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.