72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Dunlop Direzza DZ102 and Nexen N Fera SU1 are within 2 points overall. Dunlop Direzza DZ102 is stronger on comfort and dry. Nexen N Fera SU1 is stronger on wet, handling and treadwear.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Direzza DZ102 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Direzza DZ102 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 40 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop Direzza DZ102 | Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 73 |
| Dry | 82 | 78 |
| Wet | 73 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 70 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 87 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 72 |
| Handling | 69 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
73
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Dunlop Direzza DZ102 is widely regarded as a high-value, entry-level Ultra-High Performance summer tire that balances impressive dry grip and comfort with an attractive price point. While many users praise its handling and road manners, consensus is split regarding its longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting rapid tread wear and inconsistent traction in heavy rain.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement grip and cornering stability
- Surprisingly high levels of ride comfort for a performance tire
- Low road noise levels compared to competitors in the segment
Cons
- Rapid or inconsistent tread wear
- Inconsistent wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Difficult to balance for some users
Observations
- Users with high-torque or tuned vehicles (300hp+) report that the tire provides sufficient grip to manage power delivery effectively.
- Drivers on 17-inch and 18-inch setups frequently highlight a significant improvement in comfort compared to previous touring or OEM tires.
- Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to correct inflation pressures, with improper settings leading to immediate degradation in feel.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop Direzza DZ102 | B · Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 58 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Dunlop
73
/ 100
Nexen
Too close to call: Dunlop Direzza DZ102 and Nexen N Fera SU1 are within 2 points overall. Dunlop Direzza DZ102 is stronger on comfort and dry. Nexen N Fera SU1 is stronger on wet, handling and treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 scores 70 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 81 vs 73 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 75 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 72 vs 67 on treadwear.
Tire A · Dunlop Direzza DZ102
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.