Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Turanza EL42 RFT vs General Grabber Arctic — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B General

General Grabber Arctic

Winter Premium Touring tires

General Grabber Arctic tread pattern
Objective (60%)
77/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
86/100
17 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
91
Snow
88
Comfort
95
Noise
80
Treadwear
85
Handling
89
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: General Grabber Arctic — better comfort, snow and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic leads by 20
A
69
B
89
Why this score
SourceTuranza EL42 RFTGrabber Arctic
Tire Rack owners 70 88
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners – 92

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic leads by 34
A
57
B
91
Why this score
SourceTuranza EL42 RFTGrabber Arctic
Tire Rack owners 58 91
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners – 94

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic leads by 58
A
30
B
88
Why this score
SourceTuranza EL42 RFTGrabber Arctic
Professional tests (TWG score) – 84
Tire Rack owners 30 91
Tyre Reviews owners – 95
SimpleTire owners – 98

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic leads by 59
A
36
B
95
Why this score
SourceTuranza EL42 RFTGrabber Arctic
Professional tests (TWG score) – 100
Tire Rack owners 38 83
Tyre Reviews owners – 90
SimpleTire owners – 91

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic leads by 47
A
33
B
80
Why this score
SourceTuranza EL42 RFTGrabber Arctic
SimpleTire owners – 87

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic leads by 40
A
45
B
85
Why this score
SourceTuranza EL42 RFTGrabber Arctic
Tire Rack owners 47 85
SimpleTire owners – 93

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic leads by 19
A
70
B
89

Scores at a glance

CategoryBridgestone Turanza EL42 RFTGeneral Grabber Arctic
Relative Score 49 88
Dry 69 89
Wet 57 91
Snow 30 88
Comfort 36 95
Noise 33 80
Treadwear 45 85
Handling 70 89

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Turanza EL42 RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B General Grabber Arctic

The General Grabber Arctic is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that offers exceptional traction on snow and ice at a competitive price point. While some users note increased road noise and a slight impact on fuel economy, the consensus highlights its reliability and superior stopping power compared to all-season alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent traction on packed snow, ice, and unplowed surfaces
  • Significant improvement in braking performance and vehicle stability
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Effective performance when studded for heavy-duty or commercial plowing applications

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise on dry or wet pavement
  • Potential for decreased fuel economy
  • Some users desire a more aggressive tread pattern for extreme conditions

Observations

  • Heavy-duty truck owners (Chevy 2500, F-150) report significant improvements in winter capability, particularly when used for plowing.
  • Users note that the tires can be a tight fit on stock rims for certain full-size trucks, though they maintain a good seal in cold temperatures.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza EL42 RFT B · General Grabber Arctic
Category—Winter Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—6
Rim diameters—16″ – 20″
Tread depth—12/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

General

Winner: General Grabber Arctic — better comfort, snow and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber Arctic scores 95 vs 36 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber Arctic scores 88 vs 30 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

General Grabber Arctic scores 80 vs 33 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic scores 85 vs 45 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza EL42 RFT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber Arctic
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.