Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental CrossContact UHP vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 94 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 94 |
| SimpleTire owners | 97 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | 97 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 47 |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 66 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 92 |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact UHP | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 89 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact UHP | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 87 |
| Dry | 86 | 92 |
| Wet | 79 | 87 |
| Comfort | 72 | 84 |
| Noise | – | 60 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 86 |
| Handling | 74 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental Cross Contact UHP is a polarizing tire that delivers strong dry and wet road performance but suffers from significant inconsistency regarding tread longevity. While many users praise its handling, stability, and confidence-inspiring grip, a substantial portion of the user base reports premature and uneven wear, particularly on heavier SUVs and 4x4 vehicles.
Pros
- Strong dry and wet road grip
- Predictable handling and cornering stability
- Good performance in light snow and varied weather conditions
- Quiet operation on many vehicle platforms
Cons
- Extremely inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- High road noise reported by a significant subset of users
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality
- Poor off-road capability, particularly on wet grass or mud
Observations
- Heavy SUVs and 4x4s frequently exhibit rapid front-axle tire wear, often requiring rotation as early as 8,000-10,000 miles to maintain even tread depth.
- Users with high-center-of-gravity vehicles report that aggressive cornering significantly accelerates rear tire scrubbing.
- Performance varies notably by vehicle weight; lighter or more balanced setups report significantly higher mileage than heavy luxury SUVs.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV is generally regarded as a high-performance tire that balances excellent wet and dry grip with a comfortable, quiet ride. While many users praise its handling precision and comfort, consensus is divided regarding tread longevity and sidewall durability, with some drivers experiencing rapid wear and vulnerability to road hazards.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise
- Responsive and precise steering feel
- Strong performance in cornering and braking
Cons
- Short tread life and rapid wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to pothole damage
- Inconsistent noise levels depending on road surface
- Poor performance in snowy conditions
Observations
- Users driving heavy SUVs like the Volkswagen Touareg noted that while the tire offers good longevity for the vehicle's weight, it can be sensitive to road surface changes.
- Performance sedan owners report high satisfaction with handling, though some note that the soft sidewalls can lead to unpredictable steering transitions under aggressive driving.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact UHP | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 9 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | 240 - 300 A - AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Goodyear
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 86 vs 53 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 89 vs 74 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 84 vs 72 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 87 vs 79 on wet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.