Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Goodyear

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
80/100
22 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
87
Snow
–
Comfort
84
Noise
60
Treadwear
86
Handling
89

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV if noise, wet and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 5 SUV leads by 3
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
95
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
92
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 94
Tire Rack owners 78 –
Tyre Reviews owners 84 94
Dry Braking (% of best) 100% 97%
Dry Handling (% of best) 100% 100%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 5 SUV leads by 4
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
91
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
87
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Professional tests (TWG score) 96 88
Tire Rack owners 70 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 90
Wet Braking (% of best) 99% 94%
Wet Handling (% of best) 100% 98%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
93
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV leads by 6
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
78
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
84
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Tire Rack owners 63 –
Tyre Reviews owners 70 85

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 5 SUV leads by 7
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
67
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
60
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Professional tests (TWG score) 46 47

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV leads by 21
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
65
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
86
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Tire Rack owners 42 –
Tyre Reviews owners 54 92

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV leads by 8
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
81
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
89
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SUVEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Tyre Reviews owners 81 89
DriverReviews owners – 84

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5 SUVGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Relative Score 79 84
Dry 95 92
Wet 91 87
Snow 93 –
Comfort 78 84
Noise 67 60
Treadwear 65 86
Handling 81 89

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 97% #3/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +2.6 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 98% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 81% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +17.7 Different tests
Grass Traction Grass 89% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 85% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +4 Different tests
Gravel Handling Gravel 100% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 98% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +1.6 Different tests
Gravel Traction Gravel 96% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 99% #3/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test -3.1 Different tests
Mud Traction Mud 82% #7/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 91% #7/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test -8.7 Different tests
Noise Other 96% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 96% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test -0.1 Different tests
Price Other 100% #7/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 88% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +12.4 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 25% #4/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +75 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 96% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 96% #7/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test -0.1 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 99% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 94% #3/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +5.3 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 98% #4/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +2.3 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV

The Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV is widely praised for its high-performance handling, superior wet and dry grip, and refined ride comfort. However, a significant portion of the user base reports dissatisfaction regarding rapid tread wear, with many owners of mid-to-large SUVs experiencing premature replacement intervals.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry braking performance
  • High levels of steering precision and handling confidence
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong traction and stability during spirited driving

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, particularly on heavier SUV models
  • High price point relative to the total mileage achieved
  • Increased road noise as the tread wears down
  • Soft rubber compound prone to puncture damage

Observations

  • Owners of mid-size SUVs like the Hyundai Tucson, VW Tiguan, and Ford Edge frequently report premature wear, often requiring replacement under 15,000 miles.
  • High-performance vehicle owners (e.g., BMW X5) report better longevity and satisfaction, suggesting the tire performs best when matched with specific high-performance chassis tuning.
  • Run-flat variants are noted for a firmer ride and increased noise compared to standard versions.
Tire B Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV is generally regarded as a high-performance tire that balances excellent wet and dry grip with a comfortable, quiet ride. While many users praise its handling precision and comfort, consensus is divided regarding tread longevity and sidewall durability, with some drivers experiencing rapid wear and vulnerability to road hazards.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • High levels of ride comfort and low noise
  • Responsive and precise steering feel
  • Strong performance in cornering and braking

Cons

  • Short tread life and rapid wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to pothole damage
  • Inconsistent noise levels depending on road surface
  • Poor performance in snowy conditions

Observations

  • Users driving heavy SUVs like the Volkswagen Touareg noted that while the tire offers good longevity for the vehicle's weight, it can be sensitive to road surface changes.
  • Performance sedan owners report high satisfaction with handling, though some note that the soft sidewalls can lead to unpredictable steering transitions under aggressive driving.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Tread depth—8 - 9/32″
UTQG—240 - 300 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Goodyear

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV if noise, wet and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 86 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 89 vs 81 on handling.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV scores 67 vs 60 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 84 vs 78 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.