69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
66/100
44 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Firestone RoadHawk vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
87/100
21 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
115 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Firestone RoadHawk if noise matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
EfficientGrip Performance 2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 90 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
EfficientGrip Performance 2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 86 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 96% | 99% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 70% | 86% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 93% | 99% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
EfficientGrip Performance 2 leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 39 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 85 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 70 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
EfficientGrip Performance 2 leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 91 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
EfficientGrip Performance 2 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 84 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone RoadHawk | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 84 |
| Dry | 84 | 87 |
| Wet | 75 | 82 |
| Comfort | 52 | 83 |
| Noise | 91 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 91 |
| Handling | 63 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 92% #8/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 80% #9/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | +11.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 93% #12/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +3.8 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #2/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test | 99% #2/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | +1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 78% #10/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | -21.7 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 100% #47/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 92% #4/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +8.3 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 55% #9/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 49% #5/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +5.9 | Same test |
| Noise | Other | 100% #20/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +2.2 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 68% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 92% #13/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -23.3 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 73% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 48% #2/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +25.7 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 77% #12/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | -23.4 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 14% #7/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 25% #4/15 · 2021 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 | -10.7 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 91% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 94% #17/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -2.7 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 56% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 90% #3/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -34.4 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 83% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 96% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | -12.7 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 27% #15/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 92% #3/12 · 2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test | -65.3 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #14/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 0% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #4/7 · 2019 NAF Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | -3.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 70% #29/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 86% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -16.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 93% #10/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -6.2 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone RoadHawk is a polarizing mid-range tire that excels in comfort and wet-weather grip for daily commuting but suffers from significant durability concerns. While many users praise its value and performance on smaller, lighter vehicles, a substantial portion of owners report rapid, uneven tread wear and soft sidewalls that compromise handling precision during spirited driving.
Pros
- Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Competitive price point compared to premium brands
- Effective performance for standard, non-sporty daily driving
Cons
- Rapid and often uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'mushy' feel and visual appearance of under-inflation
- Lack of steering feedback and precision in cornering
- Reports of premature cracking or perishing in low-mileage scenarios
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiesta, Golf) report higher satisfaction regarding comfort and handling compared to owners of heavier diesel estates or vans.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles frequently report significant sidewall deflection and poor cornering confidence, often requiring higher tire pressures to compensate.
- The tire is frequently criticized for lack of stability when fitted to commercial vans, with users noting a 'wobbling' sensation under load.
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is widely regarded as a premier touring tire, consistently praised for its exceptional longevity, comfort, and low noise levels. While most users report a transformative improvement in ride quality and fuel efficiency compared to OEM tires, a minority of drivers note a 'vague' steering feel due to soft sidewalls and occasional reports of increased noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Significant improvement over factory-fitted eco-tires
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and body roll
- Reported increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Not suitable for aggressive or sporty driving styles
- Occasional reports of structural issues or vibration at higher mileages
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and diesel estates report impressive mileage, often exceeding 40,000 miles.
- Drivers of vehicles with stiff 'sports' suspension noted that the tire's soft sidewall helps significantly with comfort, though it reduces steering precision.
- Some users on 16-inch and 17-inch wheels noted that the tire's comfort-oriented design makes the vehicle feel less 'sharp' compared to UHP alternatives.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Firestone RoadHawk
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Community feedback for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, highlighting exceptional durability, great wet performance, and high comfort levels. Some users note drawbacks such as softer sidewalls affecting sharp handling during spirited driving, while others debate comparisons with rival brands like Michelin and Continental.
r/TyreReviews
·5 upvotes ·2026-08-23
“Advice on new tyres So my car got stolen (RIP) and I bought a 16' MB c200d with rears 245/40r18 Its time to change them and I don't know what to do. A/S are not needed because snow is very rare in central Spain. Winter temperatures range between 0-10°C and summer range from 30 to 40. As I drive 25-30000 km per year I especially value wet performance and durability (Minimum 35-40000 km). The problem is, the tyres that would fit perfectlly to me are not available in this size (GY efficient grip performance 2 -best tyres i've ever had- and Michelin Primacy 5). What i've seen is Firestone (both roadhawk 2 and roadhawk sport), continental PC7, GY assy 6, Michelin PS5, bridgestone T6, Dunlop sport TG, kormoran/tigar/Taurus summer 2, nexen sport, hancook (Ventus evo 137 and Ventus prime 4) and kumho ps72. Even though It would be nice to save some money, i'm worried about losing rear grip when wet (its my first rwd) so its not important. What would you pick? Read more”
r/TyreReviews
·3 upvotes ·2026-06-16
“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2024-02-26
“close call, if you looking for rolling resistance Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is the right one but otherwise is PC6. You can see how the newer PC7 fair against the Goodyear below”
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2024-11-10
“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Those are summer tires, I just removed them for swapping with winter ones and I haven't cleaned them yet. They are quite dirty at the moment. The leaking one, pictured, was in the front this year, I switch them front/back every year. In my opinion it can do one last year (next summer) in the back. How would you fix the leak? I read those slime sprays damages the tire internally over time, but them its really approaching end of life fast in my opinion... I did visual inspection, I really dont see anything except maybe 1or two very tiny mark that could have been a nail puncture or something but its nothing sure... Maybe soap+ water? Thanks for hints. Ps: I have the tool somewhere for the indicator measurement, I cant find it right now.”
Top themes
#High treadwear and longevity#Wet weather performance#Ride comfort and low noise#Soft sidewalls and cornering#Fuel efficiency and rolling resistance#Comparison with Michelin Primacy
Based on 9 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone RoadHawk | B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Firestone
84
/ 100
Goodyear
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Firestone RoadHawk if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 91 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 83 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Firestone RoadHawk scores 91 vs 70 on noise.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 84 vs 63 on handling.
Tire A · Firestone RoadHawk
Tire B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone RoadHawk also compared with
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.