74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
152 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 81 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 77 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 72 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 79 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE720 | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 83 |
| Dry | 84 | 91 |
| Wet | 77 | 85 |
| Snow | – | 67 |
| Comfort | 70 | 84 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 78 |
| Handling | 77 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE720 is a polarizing performance tire characterized by its exceptional dry grip, stiff sidewalls, and precise handling. While enthusiasts praise its track-ready responsiveness and cornering stability, many users report significant drawbacks regarding rapid tread wear, high price points, and a lack of ride comfort.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- High steering responsiveness due to stiff sidewalls
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Strong performance in competitive or spirited driving scenarios
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
- High price-to-value ratio compared to competitors
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users
Observations
- Users noted that the stiff sidewalls provide excellent feedback on smaller, agile vehicles like the Fiat Tipo, though at the expense of ride comfort.
- Competitive road rally usage resulted in extremely fast wear, with front tires lasting approximately 5,000 miles under heavy load.
The Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, wet weather confidence, and comfort at a competitive price point. While it excels in daily driving and spirited road use, some enthusiasts note limitations in steering precision and sidewall stiffness when pushed to the absolute limit on track or in aggressive cornering.
Pros
- Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier brands.
- Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet road conditions.
- Low road noise levels and high comfort for a performance tire.
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit.
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'floaty' feel or lack of steering feedback during aggressive maneuvers.
- Tread life is generally considered average to short, particularly for spirited drivers.
- Performance can degrade noticeably as the tire wears down, specifically regarding noise and wet grip.
- Not suitable for cold weather or near-freezing temperatures.
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Mustang GT, C5/C6 Corvette) report excellent straight-line hook but note that aggressive driving significantly accelerates rear tread wear.
- Drivers of European sedans (BMW, Audi) appreciate the comfort and noise reduction compared to OEM run-flat tires, though some note the soft sidewall is less ideal for track-focused setups.
- Some users on 17-inch or smaller wheels report a firmer ride than expected, while those on larger diameters generally praise the balance of comfort and performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE720 | B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Bridgestone
83
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 84 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 78 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 85 vs 77 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 91 vs 84 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE720
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 also compared with
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.