75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
43 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta LE Sport | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 91 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta LE Sport | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta LE Sport | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta LE Sport | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 81 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta LE Sport | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta LE Sport | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 85 |
| Dry | 81 | 91 |
| Wet | 76 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 78 | 88 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 82 |
| Handling | 72 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta LE Sport is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that punches above its price point, offering impressive dry and wet grip for spirited driving. While many users praise its handling characteristics and comfort, opinions are polarized regarding its long-term durability and road noise, with some reports of inconsistent tread wear and sidewall fragility.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry and wet traction
- Predictable, progressive handling at the limit
- Improved ride comfort compared to some OEM alternatives
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle setups
- Reports of sidewall weakness and bubbling
- Increased road noise on imperfect surfaces
- Performance drop-off as the tire reaches the end of its tread life
Observations
- Users with high-torque, front-wheel-drive vehicles frequently reported accelerated front-tire wear.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles (e.g., Alfa Romeo 159) noted that the tire performs well initially but may struggle with the vehicle's weight over time.
- Owners of performance-oriented cars (e.g., Golf R, Audi RS4) noted that the tire provides excellent value for rear-axle fitments.
The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
- Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
- Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
- Not suitable for high-performance track applications
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
- Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
- Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta LE Sport | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Kumho
85
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 76 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 81 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 78 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 72 on treadwear.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta LE Sport
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.