Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
258 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
81
Snow
79
Comfort
83
Noise
89
Treadwear
81
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Solus TA31

All Season Premium Touring tires

Kumho Solus TA31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
64
Snow
44
Comfort
74
Noise
–
Treadwear
63
Handling
64

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 11
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
86
B — Kumho Solus TA31
75
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners 85 85
Tyre Reviews owners 83 74
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 17
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners 81 77
Tyre Reviews owners 78 63
SimpleTire owners 87 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 35
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
B — Kumho Solus TA31
44
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners – 57
Tyre Reviews owners – 43
SimpleTire owners 79 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 9
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
83
B — Kumho Solus TA31
74
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners 84 78
Tyre Reviews owners 78 73
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
89
B — Kumho Solus TA31
–
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 18
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
B — Kumho Solus TA31
63
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
Tire Rack owners 82 78
Tyre Reviews owners 75 61
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 15
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
Tyre Reviews owners 79 64

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Kumho Solus TA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS31Kumho Solus TA31
Relative Score 81 64
Dry 86 75
Wet 81 64
Snow 79 44
Comfort 83 74
Noise 89 –
Treadwear 81 63
Handling 79 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecsta PS31

The Kumho Ecsta PS31 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in daily driving comfort and quietness. While it offers impressive dry grip and reliable wet weather performance for most drivers, enthusiasts often note that its soft sidewalls result in less steering precision and reduced feedback during aggressive cornering compared to premium ultra-high-performance alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
  • Predictable and capable wet weather performance for most conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
  • Increased noise levels as the tire wears down

Observations

  • Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda Miata, Honda Civic) often praise the comfort and value, while those with heavier or more powerful vehicles report more pronounced sidewall flex and handling vagueness.
  • Drivers running low-profile sizes on rough roads report a higher susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and damage from potholes, suggesting a need for road hazard coverage.
  • The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade in comfort and noise reduction when replacing OEM run-flat tires.
Tire B Kumho Solus TA31

The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.

Pros

  • Low noise levels and high ride comfort
  • Strong value for money
  • Attractive aesthetic design
  • Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving

Cons

  • Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
  • Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
  • Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
  • Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention

Observations

  • Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
  • Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 B · Kumho Solus TA31
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available419
Rim diameters17″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9.5/32″
UTQG460 A A500 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 79 vs 44 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 79 vs 64 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.