54
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
54/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy EV vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Energy Saver A/S — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Michelin Energy EV if wet matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Energy EV | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Energy EV leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Energy EV | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 53 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy EV | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 52 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Energy EV | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 69 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | Energy EV | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 33 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Energy EV | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy EV | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 65 |
| Dry | 68 | 75 |
| Wet | 63 | 55 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | 58 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 33 | 64 |
| Handling | 58 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
54
/ 100
Tire A
65
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy EV is generally regarded as a specialized, efficiency-focused tire that offers competent dry and wet grip for small electric vehicles like the Renault Zoe. However, user consensus is heavily marred by reports of premature structural degradation, high susceptibility to punctures, and a disproportionately high price point relative to its longevity.
Pros
- Commendable grip levels in both dry and wet conditions
- Effective contribution to vehicle range maximization
- Performance comparable to higher-tier performance tires despite eco-focused design
Cons
- High susceptibility to sidewall damage and punctures
- Premature aging, including cracking and block degradation
- Rapid tread wear on front-wheel-drive configurations
- High retail price for a small-diameter tire
Observations
- Users of the Renault Zoe frequently report that the front tires suffer from significantly faster wear and structural issues compared to the rear tires.
- The tire's thin sidewall construction is a recurring point of failure for urban driving environments involving curbs.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy EV | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Electric Vehicle tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
54
/ 100
Michelin
65
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Energy Saver A/S — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Michelin Energy EV if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 64 vs 33 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 70 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 67 vs 58 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Energy EV scores 63 vs 55 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin Energy EV
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy EV also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.